diyAudio logo

History of Crossover


Older Newer
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:01:03 . . . . (petemck)? [procedures added]


Changes by last author:

Added:
= Introduction =
<Paul Spencer>

A crossover is a series of filters which seek to optimise the performance
of a loudspeaker. One of the main functions of a crossover is to divide
the signal to be reproduced by each driver. While this part alone is more
involved than it may sound, there is a lot more to crossovers than this.

There are two main types of crossover:

1. Passive crossovers: This is the most common type. After the signal has
been amplified, the signal is divided by passive components to the drivers.
A passive crossover consists of resistors, capacitors and inductors.

2. Active crossovers: An active crossover is inserted in-between the
pre and power amps and uses active circuits. Each output from the crossover
needs to then be amplified, hence a 2 way active crossover requires two
power amps. If you have an integrated amp with pre-out and main-in connections,
you merely need to add on another power amplifier.
=== Active vs passive crossovers: which is better? ===
As with many issues in audio, there isn't a single approach which is embraced
by all as the best solution. I'll present three common views:

1. Passive is best:
When cost is considered in the equation, a well designed passive speaker driven,
the best you can afford with good quality amplification will provide the best
solution. Those that hold to this view are likely to focus more on high end
amps and source components, hence the cost of buying more power amplifiers is
prohibitive. Further, there are those that believe the active circuits are more
intrusive than passive components.

2. Active is best:
An active system will optimse a speaker system far better, so that the full
capabilities of the amplifiers and speakers can be experienced. While more
amplifiers are needed, the available power is used more efficiently and not wasted,
hence you are not paying for power that is being wasted. Some speakers can't be
properly optimised with passive crossovers.

3. Combination:
There are some which view active as the ideal, however, a compromise can often
be more cost effective. The simplest and most cost-effective active implementation
is to add a 2 way active crossover to a 3 way speaker, where the passive crossover
between the tweeter and mid drivers is retained, but the mid crosses actively to
the woofer. This is also a good upgrade to a 2 way passive speaker, which many will
find more musically satisfying than adding a subwoofer.

My own position on this is that an active system if done right should always perform
better. However, an active system will often be beyond the skills of a beginner to
design properly. In this case, it may be wise to start with a 2 way passive speaker
that someone else has already designed. From there you can experiment with active
crossovers and filters, however, it's best to have something that works simply first,
then move on from there.
=== Digital active crossovers: the way of the future? ===
A very appealing new option has arrived - digital active crossovers. For the beginner,
there is the appeal of being able to experiment, and not committ to a design which
requires parts to be chosen and soldered together. Consider a popular diy unit,
Behringer Ultradrive DCX2496:

[Behringer Ultradrive DCX2496] Product website

It has a number of features which aren't possible on any other type of crossover:

* adjustable delays
* manual/auto correction for room temperature, phase and arrival time differences
* digital delay for each channel
* different settings can be changed in a quick A/B comparison

Other main features:

* with selectable roll-off characteristics from 6 to 48 dB/octave
* several types of EQs (LP/BP/HP) for each input and output
* dynamic EQs for level-dependent equalization
* parametric EQs

A nice feature of such a unit for the diy enthusiast is that you can reconfigure
for future projects. When you are finished with a passive speaker, your investment
in passive components may be lost, unless you are able to sell for a good price.

There are other units which are considerably more sophisticated, at greater cost.
At this price, this unit is cheaper than most software programs you would need
to design a passive speaker, unless you opt to navigate through the maze of
working out how to operate Speaker Workshop!
=== So what is so good about active crossovers? ===
There is a very good article on this topic at Elliott Sound Products:

[Benefits of Bi-amplification]

The article sums up some of the main advantages of active crossovers:

* Effectively (up to) twice the "real" power of the amplifiers themselves
* Reduced intermodulation distortion
* Accurate crossover points more readily achieved
* Greater linearity
* Easier load for amplifiers
* No padding is required to align the driver sensitivities, so we are not simply wasting power
* The damping factor is greatly improved for both the low and midrange loudspeakers
* The flexibility to choose amplifiers which are at their best within a defined frequency range

More exotic speaker types such as horns and dipoles are very difficult to optimse
with passive crossovers, and in many cases not practical.
=== Crossover basics ===
There are some very good articles on the topic on the ESP website:

*[Passive crossover design]

*[Effects of impedance on loudspeaker drivers]

*[Baffle step compensation]

There are three types of filters:

*high pass (HP): passes high frequencies, but filters out anything below the corner frequency (fc)
*low pass (LP): passes low frequencies, but filters out above fc
*band pass (BP): passes frequencies in between the HP and LP filters grouped together

All filters have a centre or corner frequency (fc). They may have a positive or negative gain.
They also have a slope which may be described an order:

*1st order filter: 6db/octave
*2nd order filter: 12db/octave
*3rd order filter: 18db/octave
*4th order filter: 24db/octave

Other common filter orders are 6 & 8. Filters with steeper slopes are rare, although some active digital
filters go as high as 300db/octave

Crossovers are also classified by different alignments:

||Filter||Characteristics||Q||Comments||
||Butterworth||Maximally flat amplitude||0.707|| ||
||Bessel||Maximally flat phase||0.5-0.7||Fastest Settling time||
||Chebyshev||Fastest rolloff||0.8-1.2||Slight peaks/dips||


=== Linkwitz Riley 24db/octave active crossovers ===
This is popular for active crossovers because if used with suitable drivers,
the result is a flat frequency response with a phase coherent crossover.
However, you can't simply replace your passive crossover with an
off the shelf system like this and expect it to sound better than a decent
passive crossover.

The main reason for this is that the drivers must each have two octaves
either side of the crossover point in order for it to be phase coherent.
Consider a three way speaker with crossover points at 200 Hz and 2.4kHz.
The tweeter must be flat down to 600 Hz and the mid must be flat up to 9.6kHz!
Further, it must be flat down to 50 Hz and the woofer must be flat up to 800 Hz!
A crossover like this could only work with a midrange driver with a very
smooth and extended response and it could not be used in a sealed chamber.
The tweeter would need to be able to operate lower than virtually any tweeter
can handle.

The alternative approach is to design filters to actually work with the
acoustic roll-off of the drivers. Suppose you want to integrate a woofer
with a 2 way passive speaker. The simplest approach would be to use a sealed
box for the main speaker. If it has a typical 6.5" midbass hifi driver, it
will most likely achieve an F3 (-3db point) at 80 Hz with a 2nd order (12db/octave)
rolloff. You could then add a low pass filter to the woofer with a slope and
corner frequency to match the acoustic rolloff.

A slightly more complicated but better performing alternative would be to put
a 2nd order high pass filter on the midrange driver with an fc at 80 Hz. The
combined roll-off will then be 4th order. Then you put a 4th order Linkwitz
Riley low pass filter on the woofer. The result is a correctly implemented
Linkwitz Riley crossover. If you wanted to achieve this with the textbook approach,
the mid would have to be flat down to 20 Hz! You would have to select a higher
crossover point of say 200 Hz and you would need some kind of loading to the mid
so that it will be flat down low enough.


Procedure: Design crossover (2 way)

Choose mid-bass driver
Obtain T/S parameters
Calculate box size
Calculate port size

Calculate BSC frequency
Obtain frequency response graph
Choose crossover point
Decide crossover order
Obtain impedance curve
Decide whether Zobel required
Calculate crossover parts values

Choose suitable tweeter
Obtain frequency response graph
Decide crossover order
Obtain impedance curve
Decide whether Zobel required
Calculate crossover parts values
Calculate L pad values

Procedure: Design crossover (3 way)

Choose mid
Obtain T/S parameters
Calculate Box size

Obtain frequency response graph
Choose crossover points
Decide crossover order
Obtain impedance curve
Decide whether Zobel required
Calculate crossover parts values
(Calculate L pad values � can be avoided if sensitivity between Woofer & mid chosen carefully)

Choose suitable tweeter
Obtain frequency response graph
Decide crossover order
Obtain impedance curve
Decide whether Zobel required
Calculate crossover parts values
Calculate L pad values

Choose suitable Woofer
Obtain T/S parameters
Calculate box size
Calculate port size

Calculate BSC frequency
Obtain frequency response graph
Decide crossover order
Obtain impedance curve
Decide whether Zobel required
Calculate crossover parts values


Getting started in Crossover Design

The basics (You've got to understand the rules before you can break them :-)
https://sound.westhost.com/lr-passive.htm
choosing xover point:
https://www.speakerbuilder.net/web_files/Articles/xover%20article/xpointmain.htm
Baffle Step Compensation: https://sound.westhost.com/bafflestep.htm

Getting it done:
Jay has a page on designing xovers using manufacturers specs without measuring:
https://www.geocities.com/woove99/Spkrbldg/DesigningXO.htm

Calculators:
https://ccs.exl.info/calc_cr.html#second
https://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-Lpad.htm
box calculator:
https://www.linearteam.dk/default.aspx?pageid=winisdpro

Measurement freeware:
Synrta - https://libinst.com/SynRTA.htm
ARTA https://www.fesb.hr/~mateljan/arta/download.htm
ARTA Jig - https://zobsky.blogspot.com/2008/01/simple-loudspeaker-measurement-jig-for.html

Examples from the designs of others can be quite instructive:
https://www.zaphaudio.com/
https://www.troelsgravesen.dk/Diy_Loudspeaker_Projects.htm
https://www.rjbaudio.com/projects.html
https://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/


= Related DIYAudio Wiki Pages =
(Crossover Table)?

= Books =
(Include recommended books here)

= Links =