how do I know a preamp is fully balanced?

as an example, I was looking at a pic of a Burson preamp/headphone amp.

There seems to be 4 "banks" of circuit for each signal for a fully balanced output?

Thank you.

(I believe the 4 trimmer pots is for the main circuit)
2022-09-09 12_11_23-Burson Audio Soloist 3X Performance Headphone Amplifier-2.png
 
Last edited:
Just because you have balanced inputs and output connectors doesn't mean the circuitry in between is balanced.
Go to Passlabs website and look at the Aleph P and Zen circuits and you will see the + and - signals handled by two sides of a circuit.
Fully balanced circuits have several advantages and are worth the extra parts to implement.
but in relation to the pic I included, would you say the preamp output is fully balanced?
 
Your’s is not as simple a question as it might seem. First, when you say balanced, do you refer to fully differential internal signal circuitry, or do you refer to signal interconnection that rejects ground (common-mode) noise, such as those utilizing XLR connectors?
 
Your’s is not as simple a question as it might seem. First, when you say balanced, do you refer to fully differential internal signal circuitry, or do you refer to a signal interconnection that rejects ground (common-mode) noise, such as those utilizing XLR connectors?
the manufacturer advertizes that the device has a fully balanced output.
I guessing this means R+/R- and L+/L-. to my noob knowledge/experience, seeing 4 circuits of each of the R/L signal would mean a balanced circuit/output?
 
Basically, yes. It would be near impossible to tell whether a circuit is truly balanced/differential or if it's pseudo-balanced, for example. And by pseudo-balanced I mean that the circuit consists of two halves, operating in opposite phase, whose outputs are summed at the end.

I'm curious which advantages you see in a fully balanced circuit, by the way.

Tom
 
  • Like
Reactions: mterbekke
Basically, yes. It would be near impossible to tell whether a circuit is truly balanced/differential or if it's pseudo-balanced, for example. And by pseudo-balanced I mean that the circuit consists of two halves, operating in opposite phase, whose outputs are summed at the end.

I'm curious which advantages you see in a fully balanced circuit, by the way.

Tom
Noise rejection. You don't use the ground as output but a complementary circuit which hopefully is symmetric so the common noise is cancelled.

Same thing with the cabling.

Note that, so far as I know, there are no "audiophile balanced" interconnects. They are not really needed.
 
the manufacturer advertizes that the device has a fully balanced output.
I guessing this means R+/R- and L+/L-. to my noob knowledge/experience, seeing 4 circuits of each of the R/L signal would mean a balanced circuit/output?
Okay, then you mean for the purpose of ground-noise rejection.

When an interconnection is referred to as balanced, what that indicates is that each of the signal phases has the same impedance to signal-ground. So, for example, both the R+ and R- output conductors might feature, say, a 110 ohm impedance to signal-ground. Although, it does not have to be that particular value, just so long as they are the same value.

While an unbalanced interconnection's output might feature a 110 ohm impedance to signal-ground from it's center-conductor (R+ or L+), but 0 ohms impedance to signal-ground from it's outer conductor (R- or L-). The description of an interconnection being balanced, or unbalanced, has to do with whether the two signal conductors have the same impedance to signal-ground or not.

The balanced output impedance value is usually specified in an owners manual, which then means that it is, in fact, balanced. Else, I suggest that you simply contact Burson to have them confirm. Is there some reason why you doubt Burson's claim that the output is balanced?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jan.didden and ejp
External noise cancellation at the input, a greater possibly gain through the gain section, depending on design of course, and noise cancellation in the circuit in the form of distortions, that is, harmonic distortions can be cancelled at the output by circuit design.
 
There is a simple test to confirm balanced inputs or outputs.
Connect an RCA cable between pin 1-2 and pin 1-3. Do You hear sound on both connections?
On a pseudo balanced connection, the pin 1-3 connection test doesn't pass sound.
Ken is right, balanced has to do with equal impedances and not with signal on both wires (pins 2 & 3 or Tip Ring on a Jack).
Many cheap mixers work this way, and bear in mind the simple classic op-amp balanced input found on 90% of the gear has unequal impedances on its inputs because of the feedback resistor interaction.
 
Noise rejection. You don't use the ground as output but a complementary circuit which hopefully is symmetric so the common noise is cancelled.
But you can get those advantages with a balanced input (driven by a balanced source). The circuit following the differential receiver does not need to be balanced.

Tom
 
Like a phono cart output. Balanced without being symmetrical.

The same is obviously true for transformers too. Interestingly i have tested this in practice with a transformer coupled preamp fed to a balanced power amp input. Electrically could not find any difference between using the transformer center tap or not. Sonically, the difference was profound.