• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

MOSFET for capacitor multiplier

I plan to use the attached circuit from Menno van der veen's article on AudioXpress in the power supply of a single ended EL84 amp. The voltage after the rectifiers will be 320V. The current is around 100 mA max.

I found this MOSFET IPAN70R450P7S from Mouser. The datasheet link is here https://www.infineon.com/dgdl/Infin...N.pdf?fileId=5546d4625f2e26bc015f499adf55405f.

What are the specific requirements for the MOSFET in this circuit? Is there any concerns on using IPAN70R450P7S? Since this part has built-in protection diodes, do I still need Z3? What will be the voltage drop across the circuit?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    78.6 KB · Views: 1,680
Thanks for the comment zdenoeddie. It made me do some research.

Rod Elliot provides a good explanation of the pros and cons for bipolar vs mosfet capacitance multipliers.

Capacitance Multiplier Power Supply Filter

I have been using a mosfet ripple filter and regulator for an SE Amp prototype that operates at 500 volts and 100ma per tube. I am quite pleased with the result. However, after reading this article I will mock up a bipolar version and compare them.

Steve
 
A capacitance multiplier doesn't have to use bipolar transistors, but they will usually be the easiest option. The ready availability of good complements (NPN and PNP), low prices and ease of use mean that most people will use this option. However, a MOSFET version may be attractive in some cases, but initial testing (by simulation) indicates that transient performance is very poor - much worse than a circuit using otherwise identical values for passive parts but with bipolar transistors.

This is the reason.
I tested it on my headamp - MOSFet vs bipolar, and yes, there is huge difference.
 
Capacitor Multipliers are often mis-understood.

A capacitor multiplier causes the output to have lower capacitive reactance.
May be used as a sort of voltage regulator.

Just remember this, there is no charge stored in the output of a capacitance multiplier.
The charge is in the cap that feeds the capacitor multiplier.

If you need lots of current, you have to provide that current to the input capacitor first, and the input cap has to have enough capacitance to keep outputting current when there is no current coming from the rectifiers (quite a few degrees of each alternation).

If the first cap runs out of charge, no capacitance multiplier in the world will do any good.
 
A BJT drops 0.55~0.60V, while the MOSFET will drop at least its Vgs which can be a few volt to many volts depending on the device selected. On high voltage rails, a few or dozen volts loss might not be problem for the fed circuit, but the dissipated power (dVxI) will be much higher when using a MOSFET.
 
zdenoeddie and others,

Would you mind to share any suggested replacement bipolars for TIP36 and BD139 that can stand 320V and 100 mA?

If you have a preferred schematic for bipolars, could you share that too?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    35.5 KB · Views: 860
TIP36 ---> MJE5731AG qty=1 price USD 1.36 at DigiKey

BD139 ---> ZTX458 qty=1 price USD 0.65 at DigiKey

BUT... please add two reverse VBE protection diodes, and also please add a non-infinite collector load resistor for the NPN. 3.3K would be a nice choice in my opinion.



_
 
Last edited:
TIP36 ---> MJE5731AG qty=1 price USD 1.36 at DigiKey

BD139 ---> ZTX458 qty=1 price USD 0.65 at DigiKey

_

I put together a LTspice simulation based on Mark's suggestion. Mark, please make sure the schematic below is accurate.

Attached are the startup behavior and filtering result. Very nice!
 

Attachments

  • Mark.JPG
    Mark.JPG
    84.7 KB · Views: 819
  • Mark Startup.JPG
    Mark Startup.JPG
    109.4 KB · Views: 650
  • Mark Output.JPG
    Mark Output.JPG
    106.9 KB · Views: 647