Subwoofer dipole with Eminence Sigma Pro A 18

Status
Not open for further replies.
In lieu of the other question on this board about the same unit in a closed box. I was curious if this driver was suitable in a dipole box. Actively driven with a sub amp.

Something like in the attached pictures.
 

Attachments

  • 30253f0358f1b5b929855972de67c47b.jpg
    30253f0358f1b5b929855972de67c47b.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 265
  • eb0f8bcea7605413fbdec7f3d04f4f5f.jpg
    eb0f8bcea7605413fbdec7f3d04f4f5f.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 250
I mean, I'm not a fan of large xmas, I think that has plenty. Large excursion means distortion to me and lots of EQ and power. I think there are better ways ie, surface area, frame type and positioning. I have U frames myself but would be interested to know how that type you picture (what would you like to call them??😉) perform
 
It does, though I think they have less space behind the cone, to such an extent that a hole is made for the magnet. Also, big advantage to use two drivers opposing each other to cancel cabinet vibrations, it works, I've experimented with something similar.

I'd probably call what you have there an N frame (almost!)
 
Last edited:
though at this low an XO point with a low Qt, OB, it seems like it's almost not worth the effort, cost unless corner loaded in a high gain room.
Interesting. Thanks for the feedback. I'll first explore other avenues open to me...in that case.

Looking at the efficiency of this particular Eminence driver vs the mentioned Oberton....it is clear that the Oberton is much more useful below 100Hz.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.