Nope, this is the direct drive approach.Still chasing the T-bot idea?
If I push it I might get 80cm, but I don't see the need for my table top prototype.
Nope, this is the direct drive approach.Still chasing the T-bot idea?
I agree. It is mostly a proof of concept. So we greedy onlookers can copy and get it moving!If I push it I might get 80cm, but I don't see the need for my table top prototype.
Hi Bill!How about a belt (or chain) with a normally-on clamp on it?
I personally would first make up the design, either a simple sketch or in CAD, get an understanding where all the important parts and sections are and than come up with what to get.
An interesting approach in this camera sliderDoes anyone see any obvious improvements/rearrangements I'm missing?
A strange opening lineSo is there after 6 years of sometimes very interesting, but mostly BS information, a room exclusing measurement system?
How do ya reckon...?... be a goddamn gift to humanity because you could trow all that crappy room correction software out and have perfect solution.
...
A very strange post all together, because this entire system doesn't have much to do inroom response, but about measuring loudspeakers.A strange opening line
There is a lot of food for thought there. The belt drive is simple.An interesting approach in this camera slider
An interesting approach in this camera slider
A strange opening line
You measure the sound the speaker generates in 2 positions and you can exclude the room. So when you use the same speaker and you know how to exclude the room it doesn't matter if you play sweeps or music to get rid of the room.How do ya reckon...?
//