one question arise when i look at various other designs, why there is a decouping cap at the input 9C502), i mean, why in the hell would there be a DC comming from the cartridge ? i understand the paranoia behind this for consumer market/mass production....?? but for a pure minimalist aspect and to reduce components in the audio path....
...why there is a decouping cap at the input 9C502), i mean, why in the hell would there be a DC comming from the cartridge ?....
Coupling, or blocking. Not decoupling.
If you mean the first plan in the thread, the '4570 opamp is a fancy '741. The input bias current can be as high as 400nA (half a microAmp). Is this OK in the cartridge? Who knows?? The conservative thing to do is block it. The blocking cap must be "large" compared to the ~~5k of the cartridge in bass or it encourages 1/f noise (rumble).
Original
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Modified (560k to 680k)
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Hi, would you share you .asc file so i can use/alter it on my side ?
thanks.
Coupling, or blocking. Not decoupling.
If you mean the first plan in the thread, the '4570 opamp is a fancy '741. The input bias current can be as high as 400nA (half a microAmp). Is this OK in the cartridge? Who knows?? The conservative thing to do is block it. The blocking cap must be "large" compared to the ~~5k of the cartridge in bass or it encourages 1/f noise (rumble).
sorry english is not my native language
my design uses a Jfet input opamp and i test it with some others like ne5532, lm4562 and some OPA. i am only experimenting. with a 4562 and "no" coupling cap i can say it sounds much more better, presence is far more defined.
thanks.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.