• Disclaimer: This Vendor's Forum is a paid-for commercial area. Unlike the rest of diyAudio, the Vendor has complete control of what may or may not be posted in this forum. If you wish to discuss technical matters outside the bounds of what is permitted by the Vendor, please use the non-commercial areas of diyAudio to do so.

Elektor PA300

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Member
Joined 2018
Thanks Kay and Fahey. I never got a manual for my 234. I Used information from Rane web site which is very thorough, bys still got hiss af hum. I will check my homesolered cables again. Cheers!
 
Member
Joined 2018
Thanks again Fahey. Actually there is a little mechanical ”hum” from the crossover itself. When time permits I will change ps. I just had a suspision that my atempt of ”semibalanced” conections was part of the problem. We will see:)
 
Member
Joined 2015
PA_300/400

Hello, Kay.
Sorry, I was away. I'm not back home yet. Ok I would give the Pcb of 300,400,600. It is still in verification, because we have created a routing conforming to our case, visible on the attachments.
Best regards.
 
Member
Joined 2015
PA_300/400

For the C9 capacity it is the compensation, at least we say so in French. Be careful, she plays on the slew-rate. Everything is indicated on the AOP 55.xxx datasheet. Normally it's more like 22 pF. The more the capacity decreases, the more the slew-rate increases. From memory it is 13v / µs maximum. Why Elektor put 33 pF, mystery. But it works. Mandatory to connect a 33 pF on pins N ° 6 & N ° 2, otherwise guaranteed oscillations.
Protection is not a problem, at least not on our side. Attention, it is preferable to mount the power supply as the original diagram. If unable to correct, the NE55.xxx is a copy. Take a circuit of big brand and not of Chinese origin !!!!.
We installed a Pa version 400, apart from a Pcb error corrected by bridging, it works well. The routing of our version took time, the Pcb is not yet fixed.
We are also testing a version with 78 / 79.xx regulators. Better in terms of stability and noise. Advice from an engineer who is a size in France.
Greetings, Jacky
 
Member
Joined 2015
PA_300/400/600

Herewith Pa. 600
Greetings
 

Attachments

  • Pa.600_Lyt.jpg
    Pa.600_Lyt.jpg
    663.5 KB · Views: 219
  • Pa.600_Pcb.jpg
    Pa.600_Pcb.jpg
    454.6 KB · Views: 216
  • Pa.600_Silk.jpg
    Pa.600_Silk.jpg
    554.6 KB · Views: 211
  • Pa.600_Lyt.pdf
    1,004.8 KB · Views: 147
  • Pa.600_Pcb.pdf
    562.1 KB · Views: 141
  • Pa.600_Silk.pdf
    437.2 KB · Views: 129
Member
Joined 2015
PA_300/400

Hi, Kay.
It should be understood that two L-shaped angles of 40x40_Ep = 5 mm is less expensive than a U of 80x40.
It is easier to machine the angle iron than the U. In addition, it is not too standardized, among manufacturers. But you can do it at a factory.
Then the, L must be connected to the main heatsink. Or do a tunnel assembly. 8 pairs at 100 volts this starts to make a nice heater. Then it is a question of feeling and of handyman ability. We are fine with the approach used on the top view of the amplifier that I have detailed. And if assembly in bridge then, it is obligatory tunnel. I hope to have answered.
Greetings.
Jacky
 

Attachments

  • Pa.xx_Main Heat.jpg
    Pa.xx_Main Heat.jpg
    288.3 KB · Views: 189
  • Pa.xx_Tunnel.jpg
    Pa.xx_Tunnel.jpg
    476.1 KB · Views: 175
Member
Joined 2018
Wont reused PC coolers for highpowered cpu be efficient? Just one for each output transistor. Mounted to alow vertical airflow.
Cheers!
 
Member
Joined 2009
Don´t think transistor per transistor but the big overheated block you are trying to cool.

As in: 1 or 2 (depending on layout) large "tunnels" where you concentrate large airflow and lots of fins together.

A CPU is on its own, or maybe you have two in a PC case, not 8/12/16/whatever transistors all together side by side.

And total heat generated is more than anything a CPU can generate.
 
Member
Joined 2011
Hi Jacky,
I'm not too sure that I get you right. Do you mean two L shaped brackets per board, which would mean two separate heatsinks, or two per side that are screwed together so that the board could be mounted in parallel with one single sink?
Best regards!
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Top