Thiel 2.3 - Substitute 4.5" Coaxial Driver

I can build another xover
I'm not trying to discourage your experiment, just bringing up some details that might or might not be relevant to you.

With a typical passive crossover and co-ax you may not be able to maintain the time/phase coherence of the original Thiel design. Modern coaxial drivers tend to have at least a minor Z offset between the midrange and tweeter acoustic centers. It's annoying, but it's there in many.

Finding one that that would let you use 6 dB/octave crossovers is a little tougher as well.

Sensitivity of typical small co-ax's can also be an issue if you want everything passive. The Thiels were pretty high at about 90.5 dB.

If you're going to go active/DSP, all of this can be corrected.

At any rate, here are a few co-ax's that are about the right size (but most have lower sensitivity in the midrange than your speaker):

SB Acoustics SB12PFCR25-4-COAX 4"
https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/coaxial/sb-acoustics-sb12pfcr25-4-coax-4-coaxial-4-ohms-round/

SB Acoustics SB12PACR25-4-COAX 4"
https://www.madisoundspeakerstore.com/coaxial/sb-acoustics-sb12pacr25-4-coax-4-round/

Morel Integra 424 - this one claims time alignment, but I have not worked with it so I'm not sure. Parts Express' page says "near perfect time-alignment," and I'm not sure what that means.
https://www.parts-express.com/Morel...-Source-Coaxial-Full-Range-297-024?quantity=1

Sica 4 C 1,5 CP - highest sensitivity I've seen in a quick search.
https://sica.it/prodotto/4-c-1-5-cp/
 
thanks Mattstat, will look into your suggestions. I think the best starting point is to remove the coaxial and do an impedance, response & TS tests so I know exactly what I'm up against. Will post the test results here sometime over the coming days..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I have a pair of Thiel 2.3 speakers in which I'd like to try a substitute 4.5 inch mid/tweeter coaxial with.

Does anyone know of a suitable substitute coaxial please?
Why do you want to substitute the original mid/tweeter coax?
Actually, it is a small fullrange driver with what can be described as having an internal "mechanical" crossover - somewhat similar to dual cone fullrange drivers.
The easiest way for substitution is to find good conventional fullrange unit (not dual-cone!).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user