This circuit is upgrade on BUZAMP from Elektor. Use only N-mosfets, with +/-50V DC give 150W on 4R load.
I think you may hit thermal stability problems. Use a compound mosfet and mount the drivers in thermal contact with the Vbe multiplier that sets the bias current.
BD139 is on heatsink with output fets for termal compenzation.
What bias current do you use?
OK, thats quite low for a FET. Lateral FETS usually need 150mA and Vertical FETS are run at 400mA. If you look at the transfer characteristics in fig 3 on the link: http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/irf/irfp250.pdf
You can see if you ran it at 400mA there is chance of thermal runaway.
You can see if you ran it at 400mA there is chance of thermal runaway.
OK, thats quite low for a FET. Lateral FETS usually need 150mA and Vertical FETS are run at 400mA. If you look at the transfer characteristics in fig 3 on the link: http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/datasheet/irf/irfp250.pdf
You can see if you ran it at 400mA there is chance of thermal runaway.
I find I can run my IRFP240/9240 amps at 10mA bias and there is no crossover distortion.
I find I can run my IRFP240/9240 amps at 10mA bias and there is no crossover distortion.
Is it a current dumping design?
Is it a current dumping design?
Its just a bog standard classAB--- ltp, vas, bias and complimentary output transistors.
I just wind up the bias with a sine wave applied and a speaker connected until the crossover disotrtion goes on the scope.
It sounds good so the low bias must be fine.
I read somewhere Peavey do this as well, keeping the bias as low as possible.
It does make sense as all extra bias is doing is heating up the heatsinks.
I find I can run my IRFP240/9240 amps at 10mA bias and there is no crossover distortion.
Is it a current dumping design?
Is it a current dumping design?
No it's not a current dumping amp.
It is unusual however, and not easy to analyse "in your head".
The bias arrangement is odd... how stable is it I wonder.
Its just a bog standard classAB--- ltp, vas, bias and complimentary output transistors.
I just wind up the bias with a sine wave applied and a speaker connected until the crossover disotrtion goes on the scope.
It sounds good so the low bias must be fine.
I read somewhere Peavey do this as well, keeping the bias as low as possible.
It does make sense as all extra bias is doing is heating up the heatsinks.
Crossover and switching distortion that is audible may not be visible on a scope measurement you really need a distortion analyser of some sort. Switching and crossover distortion does not seem to affect some peoples enjoyment of music. For others, me included, it sounds like scratching glass which is why there is a valve and class A contingent in this conf 🙂.
As far as I am aware Peavey amps are used for guitars so will not have much HF content and if they did the bass unit would not reproduce it anyway so there is no point in trying to reduce it.
As far as increasing the bias current it does make sense if you are one of the lucky or unlucky few, the cost of getting rid of those distortions is high!, that finds switching and crossover distortion annoying. As the bias current increases the switching and crossover point occurs at higher power levels and the louder the music the less sensitive the ear is to distortion.
Human ears cant hear THD<1%
As far as I am aware if its the second harmonic then you are right, as musical instruments produce large amounts of second harmonics the ear does not find it objectionable. In the case of higher order harmonics produced by switching distortion and to a lesser extent crossover distortion then the ear is sensitive at much lower levels.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- 150W MOSFET Amplifier with IRFP250x2