Looking really nice.Yes, I'm pretty sure they are. I already measured the driver(s) with a completely different device and it was very similar:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...-design-the-easy-way-ath4.338806/post-6736091
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...-design-the-easy-way-ath4.338806/post-6736434
It should be no problem to EQ any of this. It's the smoothest driver I have at hand. I expect it to cover the range 600 Hz - 20 kHz with ease.
- I even measured the driver in my wavefront shape experiment. Above 10 kHz it resembles the same FR shape:
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...-design-the-easy-way-ath4.338806/post-7307030
I love hex and 12 sided shapes too.
Pretty typical plot I think.
+/-5dB is okay by me.
Judging by the drop off after about 5-6K I'd be crossing in another higher freq driver, or am I missing something?
I use Raal Lazy ribbons above 11KHz and to infinity 🙂, but they would go down to 3.5KHz no problem.
I've also found the best sounds are achieved with no EQ at all, on these frequencies, with my drivers.
My view: This horn has a very smooth and gradually controlled directivity through the whole audio band, it would be detrimental to cut it and try to cross to another HF driver, the more so as the driver is capable of nicely covering it all as well... The EQ per se is nothing to be avoided, nothing to be afraid of - it's done all the time, every crossover is an EQ in a sense.
BTW, I think that in this case a good deal of the required EQ can be done passively, by some basic RC network. And then do the rest with an active/DSP setup. Certainly that's what I would do.
BTW, I think that in this case a good deal of the required EQ can be done passively, by some basic RC network. And then do the rest with an active/DSP setup. Certainly that's what I would do.
Last edited:
The exit wavefront is certainly better behaved. I would suspect it's also the smaller internal cavities and their shapes with the ring radiator. Seems there's simply less room for various resonances to occur. But I haven't measured any other large-format RR CDs.
The HF1440 has an 86 mm voice coil - not actually a small one.
The HF1440 has an 86 mm voice coil - not actually a small one.
Last edited:
Hi Fabio,
ATHEX 260-25 is not what you're looking for?
(I guess I could make it a little wider, but I would consider it 90° as it is.)
Or there's the ST260(B).
ATHEX 260-25 is not what you're looking for?
(I guess I could make it a little wider, but I would consider it 90° as it is.)
Or there's the ST260(B).
Last edited:
Dear Mabat, thanks for your reply!
the Athex looks intresting, but do you think i could use something like your Tritonia, just smaller?
It´s for PA Tops(sorry, didn´t mention that before). Is there a Tritonia-design that´s max 300mm broad and can be used for 1.4" BMS4554?
the Athex looks intresting, but do you think i could use something like your Tritonia, just smaller?
It´s for PA Tops(sorry, didn´t mention that before). Is there a Tritonia-design that´s max 300mm broad and can be used for 1.4" BMS4554?
You can try this one but it's without any guarantee on its performance.
ASC file: https://at-horns.eu/ext/Tritonia-36-290x250x90.zip
(How to work with ASC files for Fusion 360 is described on the ATHEX page).
- Which reminds me I have a pair of BMS 4554 somewhere...
ASC file: https://at-horns.eu/ext/Tritonia-36-290x250x90.zip
(How to work with ASC files for Fusion 360 is described on the ATHEX page).
- Which reminds me I have a pair of BMS 4554 somewhere...
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)