This is a photo of my USB to I2S converter. Not sure if it is the "JLSounds" you mentioned.@Tea-Bag , this is correct.
Do you mind showing a picture of your JLSounds board?
I don't think that is a JLSounds product.
Some info on JLSounds here :
http://jlsounds.com/i2soverusb.html
Some info on JLSounds here :
http://jlsounds.com/i2soverusb.html
Nope but we give an answer to a member who asked for this board (JLSOUNDS, which is a brand) he has and many people also have as it has given subjecctive good results. Amanero cheap copies has given subjectivly less good sounding results. Often SPIDF is best avoided for final sounding quality.
You migth have more answers if you read the thread in spite of poping up here out of context.
The little spidf/USB board you show looks like a Sygnalyst, btw. Pretty.
Just the way I see it at least, as people have high enough expectations being audio educated. 🙂 You will learn a lot at reading the thread.
You migth have more answers if you read the thread in spite of poping up here out of context.
The little spidf/USB board you show looks like a Sygnalyst, btw. Pretty.
Just the way I see it at least, as people have high enough expectations being audio educated. 🙂 You will learn a lot at reading the thread.
Last edited:
Thank you
I roughly understand what you mean.
I see that "JLSounds" is a "USB bridge" based on the XMOS XU208 master chip.
The function is the same as my DIY CT7601PR converter.
When "MCLK" is not used to provide the clock signal for the DAC, there is no difference in the sound quality between the two.
At least I think so.
But if MCLK is needed, maybe XMOS will perform better because it is based on an external crystal to provide the I2S master clock signal.
I roughly understand what you mean.
I see that "JLSounds" is a "USB bridge" based on the XMOS XU208 master chip.
The function is the same as my DIY CT7601PR converter.
When "MCLK" is not used to provide the clock signal for the DAC, there is no difference in the sound quality between the two.
At least I think so.
But if MCLK is needed, maybe XMOS will perform better because it is based on an external crystal to provide the I2S master clock signal.
I have a lot of them here, and I guarantee they are genuine. But for people in most areas, the high shipping costs are a problem
'Lil ot, is something like these values available for a genuine pcm1704 chip that anyone of you know of?Go to post #1042. Miro posted the resistances across pins.
here are resistances between pins on a working AD1862:
1-2 = 2R
11-12 = 3k3
13-12 = 6k6
1-3 = 38k
1-12 > 14M
16-12 > 14M
1-16 > 17M
4-9 > 25M or open
8-9 > 25M or open
4-8 > 25M or open
15-12 > 25M or open
5,6,7 - 9 = open
I am starting to create a cart for the components, I assume all of the through hole resistors are 1/4W unless stated otherwise, is this a correct assumption?AD1865 ... the same principle
Not having AD1865 DAC in the collection?
Here is one ... the same PCB changed for AD1865 DAC.
It is tested by @Vunce.
Power supplies are slightly different!
analog part: +5VA, -5VA
digital part: +5VD
Have DIY fun 🙂
Eliad
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Line Level
- DAC AD1862: Almost THT, I2S input, NOS, R-2R