EZ-Dump: dump your current without really trying

Assembled 1 channel and tested this amp earlier today. Unlike my first attempt 4 years ago, this time it worked like a champ.
The only thing that could be better is slew rate. This amp seems to be on the slower side (20 V/us as far as I can tell), but totally adequate.
LT1056 was used as U2, and LF356 as U1. Later will try LT1056 as U1 (4 years ago it oscillated more with LT).


curr_dump_passive2.jpg


pcb.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20250119_113907.jpg
    20250119_113907.jpg
    413.2 KB · Views: 73
  • 20250119_154738.jpg
    20250119_154738.jpg
    494.4 KB · Views: 67
  • 20250119_154755.jpg
    20250119_154755.jpg
    481.4 KB · Views: 72
  • squares_1khz.jpg
    squares_1khz.jpg
    448 KB · Views: 72
  • sinus_1khz.jpg
    sinus_1khz.jpg
    451.9 KB · Views: 70
  • EZdumpPassive2.01.asc
    EZdumpPassive2.01.asc
    11.7 KB · Views: 27
  • squares_34khz.jpg
    squares_34khz.jpg
    452.1 KB · Views: 90
Tried LT1056 as U1 (floating op-amp). Everything works the same, and amp is slightly faster (10% faster rise time on squares).

Update2: Also tried:
a) OPA134 - works exactly the same as LF356, same speed
b) LT1357 - doesn't work at all (no amplification)
c) TLE2081 - works fine, faster than LT1056 by another 10% (20% faster than LF356)
 

Attachments

  • 1khz_thd.jpg
    1khz_thd.jpg
    180.4 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: chermann and steveu
Hi minek
nice amp.
what aoubout the output transistors. is there a change to make them faster? less cob
e.g. 2sa1987 Toshiba...but just 180W power.
My previous amp (op-amp based circlophone) was built with exactly same output transistors, and achieved very high slew rate.
So I don't think it's the output - in this case it's clearly the VAS (U1) being the bottleneck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chermann
Interesting thing - I replaced U2 (non-floating input op-amp) with TL071 (which is slower than LT1056), and:
a) squares rise time is faster (1.8V/us vs 3V/us)
b) there is overshot visible
So perhaps it's not U2 alone, affecting the overall speed of the amp, seems like U2 also plays a role in it.
Ignoring the overshot - I'm curious how come using SLOWER op-amp would speed the the whole amp?
 
I tried one more op-amp (as U1): LT1223. It's a very fast op-amp (up to 1000V/us Slew Rate), and surprisingly it 'kind of worked'.
I could see sinus or square waves on the scope, but there were some oscillations visible on the sinus/square lines.
Perhaps a matter of adjusting some RC values in the sim, or designing a better PCB with guards.
But anyway - rise time of the squares was 2us - similar like TLE2081.
So conclusion is that the overall slew rate of the whole amp is limited not just be the speed of U1, but definitely by some other factors as well.