We don't know everything. As time goes on and for some animals, we learn things that at one time may have seemed nonsensical: https://www.indiatoday.in/science/s...it's their,in navigating these long distances.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03618-9
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01596-6
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03618-9
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01596-6
There are responses to fields in cases of a glioblastoma. So an MRI may show something in addition to verifying a response system.
Well the first time I noticed this was around 2009 so that’s quite a long time for something like that I’m guessing.
That case was with the configuring 3G usb aircards.
Best way I can describe the experience was like a blast of hot air that developed from a tingling sensation to painful even over the brief minute or so if use for each card. Only with this one particular model however for each card. I would have configured 50 or more. Later 4G model by the same company, no obvious sensation, if anything possibly a slight but ignorable sensation. Nothing that would prevent me using it for reasonable periods
During that time I have had a MRI for other reasons and no sign of anything disturbing was reported.
Im not sure that a doctor is likely to refer me and my misbehaving devices for an MRI without ongoing symptoms, which I don’t have
Off on another tangent.
Magnetic fields escaping faraday cages.
ODINI: Escaping Sensitive Data From Faraday-Caged, Air-Gapped Computers via Magnetic Fields
Magnetic fields escaping faraday cages.
ODINI: Escaping Sensitive Data From Faraday-Caged, Air-Gapped Computers via Magnetic Fields
It's also a standard single-fault test run for CE now. The main safety ground is lifted and a human impedance simulation circuit is connected to the floating system ground or other accessible conductive parts to check for excessive voltage on them. The device is allowed more voltage on accessible metal parts in this fault state, but there's a limit you're not allowed to exceed.
I don't think you need to go to a lab or involve any additional equipment initially. You just need an assistant and a plan to exposure yourself to the device without knowing its status (on or off). Do this multiple times in each state. Calculate percentage of the time you were correct in guessing the condition. Does that exceed chance? Optimally the test would be double blind, but that's more involved and probably not necessary with a good assistant.
If you get through the above test with an interesting result, you could then add another device that seemingly doesn't induce the odd feelings and compare the results for each device.
fMRI is more likely for an application like this, but it's not like you're just going to walk up and ask for one with your device in tow and get an average doctor to play along. I've not met many practicing medical doctors that like to experiment. A researcher at a university that's already looking at something similar might be interested in you and your device if you can prove that you can actually detect its state in a blinded test condition.
I don't remember seeing the manufacturer of the devices in question in your previous messages. There are some shadier brands in all electronics these days. Assuming your response is statistically verifiable, I would assume the devices are either poorly designed or malfunctioning in some way. Without some test gear to measure the spectrum and power levels of the RF output, it's hard to say what's going on on that front though.
Last edited: