Lead/lag vs. Miller compensation

Simple question: Why do most (almost all) negative feedback amplifiers use Miller compensation rather than lead/lag? The latter has a much flatter Bode plot of the OLG which, I believe, should increase the slew rates.

What’s the disadvantage of a lead/lag (other than the need for larger caps)?
 
Most amplifiers use a Miller capacitor around the VAS because it moves the dominant pole (formed by the VAS's collector-base capacitance) to a much lower frequency, without creating a new pole. The last thing one wants is two low-frequency poles.

Successful use of lag compensation requires moving the VAS's collector-base pole to a much higher frequency. This is best done through cascoding. I like this approach because it does not degrade the PSRR at high frequencies.

A lead capacitor can be used with either technique.
Ed
 
Lead comp in a VFA gains you some phase margin around the unity loop gain frequency. But, if you over do it you can make a decently Miller comp’d amp’s transient response worse, so you should check this out in a sim and then on the bench.

(Never ever use lead comp on a CFA! You will have a fine power oscillator)
 
  • Like
Reactions: hbtaudio
Hi lineup,

Below, I believe C3 is a an example of lead compensation mentioned in posts 5 and 6.

Regards,
Steve

1740485302467.png