NJW0281G / NJW0302G instead of 2SC5200/2SA1943

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ian.... i will check the the pair 1N5401 B-E while powered up and tell you the measure i began to have hope that very logic.. while the input differential pair those who control the offset
the 100w ultimate post... i think i'm getting enough help here from all of you good kind folks ... thank you all dear friends
 
Ah , seems like sir Apex has too many models , as well. 😀

That's why I'm reviewing the slew stuff , too many choices - needs to
be more "structure". And more documentation -
Something like the "Badger" is always the same - easy to advise on a problem.
With many designs , one might get "forgotten" 🙁 .

OS

That what i thought Ostripper but what else i could do but to make my own thread hopping help from others.
 
Hi Vin,

I'm attaching a schematic with approximate voltages. They should get you in the ballpark. I did it in PDF so it was more legible.

Hope this helps.

Blessings, Terry

-- sir i don't know how to thank you ... this simulation schematic really making me a lot happier ..
as a reference to the schematic readings you sent.... i think i got a problem with "Q3" it's collector voltage is not 10v it's 17.5v so the voltage drop across the 10k Resistor "R3" is 8.5v but in your simulation it's 659mv which is leading to the voltage on "Q2" Base which in my case is 7.9v ( Very big difference 50mv to 7.9v😱) and some how the collector of Q9 is 9.5v instead of 1v😱......which finally i think it's loading effect on +ve to be 33v instead of 40v while it's not the case in the -ve supply it's -40v no problem..

so sir i think Q3 may be causing this ( i double checked it with diode check on multimeter it's fine) or what else could be causing all this mess ....😕

but i think now i'm very near to the mistake ... thanks Mr.Terry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.