Technics SE-A3 bias adjustment

Here are some more pictures of my very difficult restoration. 🙂
 

Attachments

  • 20250403_231346.jpg
    20250403_231346.jpg
    698.5 KB · Views: 26
  • 20250403_144000.jpg
    20250403_144000.jpg
    547.9 KB · Views: 21
  • 20250403_143958.jpg
    20250403_143958.jpg
    536.4 KB · Views: 20
  • 20250403_143954.jpg
    20250403_143954.jpg
    486.2 KB · Views: 22
  • 20250403_142403.jpg
    20250403_142403.jpg
    813.1 KB · Views: 23
  • 20250403_142353.jpg
    20250403_142353.jpg
    935.7 KB · Views: 24
  • 20250403_004554.jpg
    20250403_004554.jpg
    729.9 KB · Views: 19
  • 20250403_004541.jpg
    20250403_004541.jpg
    735.5 KB · Views: 20
  • 20250402_003037.jpg
    20250402_003037.jpg
    619.3 KB · Views: 23
  • 20250401_232614.jpg
    20250401_232614.jpg
    721.1 KB · Views: 24
One more question for you experts out there…
I replaced both original, brand-new FETs:
µPA68H - L
with new µPA68H - K.

Does this letter difference actually cause noticeable distortion in sound?

The service manual says:
Transistor, Input Differential Amplifier
(Use in ranks L or M) [FET]

So, it should be replaced with L or M versions.
But L or M are nowhere to be found.

Should I rather keep the original L versions, even if they’re old?
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20250416-WA0004(1).jpg
    IMG-20250416-WA0004(1).jpg
    167.3 KB · Views: 7
  • 20250416_095617.jpg
    20250416_095617.jpg
    334 KB · Views: 7
In FET's those type of letters often denote Idss which is the drain current at zero gate/source bias voltage.

If that is so then you have to assume the original spec is going to be the best even others seem to work. No reason to suspect the older parts unless you have evidence to the contrary (such as they are actually known to fail or deteriorate)
 
Why did I decide to replace them??
On one channel, the distortion was raised at the 3rd harmonic.
Now I don’t know if those overly strong resistors in the bias circuit are also to blame for this…
If it gets worse, I’ll put the original old FETs back in.
 
What do you think? Can we replace this burnt foil with self-adhesive aluminum foil?
It's a heat-resistant aluminum foil.
I think the light would reflect better than it does now. With the new lights, it seems too dark to me.
What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • 20250423_225528.jpg
    20250423_225528.jpg
    487 KB · Views: 3
  • 20250423_225414.jpg
    20250423_225414.jpg
    571.5 KB · Views: 3
  • 20250423_225407.jpg
    20250423_225407.jpg
    608.8 KB · Views: 3
No problem…
Here’s the update: I’ve replaced the resistors, and things have improved nicely.
The bias now also stays low.
After 1 hour of warm-up, I set the bias to 30 millivolts, and it’s holding steady.
I’ve adjusted the DC offset to 0.000V on both channels.
Later today, I’ll also try a test with a 4-ohm load to see how far it can go.



I’ll probably put the original FETs back in…
Everyone says that the ones marked with an "L" were made more precisely back in the 1980s.
But I don’t even know how I would measure them, since I don’t have the equipment to test FETs…

As for the light, I asked if anyone has ever replaced the original burnt foil with a different one…
 
Last edited: