"Should have" is often contracted in speech to "should've" and the "ve" sound is very similar to "of".
Let's see how far some of you grammar police are willing to go. Grammatically, saying (or writing) "I'm him" or "that's me" when someone calls out your name is wrong. In English, using the verb "to be" (that is, alone and not as an auxiliary verb in a construction like "is helping") after a subject does not create an object to be acted upon. This is called a "subject complement" and the subject merely renames itself. To be "correct," you should say "I'm he" and "that's I."
I learned this rule in graduate school but I almost never follow it because it sounds, well, stilted and pretentious.
Woe is I?
Yup, that's "correct" English.
I learned this rule in graduate school but I almost never follow it because it sounds, well, stilted and pretentious.
Woe is I?
Yup, that's "correct" English.
Oh it's too blummin' hot! Can't get me favourite biskits over here! It's not like 'ome, is it? Flippin' beer's too cold! 😉
The other one that is a pet peeve is using "So" to start a sentence.
https://www.fastcompany.com/3029762/how-a-popular-two-letter-word-is-undermining-your-credibility
https://www.fastcompany.com/3029762/how-a-popular-two-letter-word-is-undermining-your-credibility
Agree.
'So, here's your problem sheeple' sounds ridiculous on two counts. I'll admit I have occasionally started sentences with 'So, . . . .' but it is something I am working on.
The other one is using 'actually' when it is not necessary.
My son got me onto Grammarly a year or two back (it's a free version - he uses the pro version for work), and it has done wonders in correcting stupid mistakes and my bad English.
'So, here's your problem sheeple' sounds ridiculous on two counts. I'll admit I have occasionally started sentences with 'So, . . . .' but it is something I am working on.
The other one is using 'actually' when it is not necessary.
My son got me onto Grammarly a year or two back (it's a free version - he uses the pro version for work), and it has done wonders in correcting stupid mistakes and my bad English.
Last edited:
"should of" and "would of" is often heard though - and I see it written too!! Annoying.. 🙂
Another pet hate for me is when people say "pin number" or lcd display"...
I am pleased that I am not the only one that finds that some of these uses of language really annoying!
Seeing some of the modern atrocities of language replayed by this community has given me a few LOLS!(If I may be so bold!) 😀
Seeing some of the modern atrocities of language replayed by this community has given me a few LOLS!(If I may be so bold!) 😀
Shakespeare waited until Sonnet 146 to use So to start a sentence
............
So shalt thou feed on Death, that feeds on men,
And, Death once dead, there's no more dying then.
Although he started a sentence with So many times in his long poem "The Rape of Lucrece", although in a way that really is not the modern use of "so..."
Example:
This earthly saint, adored by this devil,
Little suspecteth the false worshipper;
For unstain'd thoughts do seldom dream on evil;
Birds never limed no secret bushes fear:
So guiltless she securely gives good cheer
And reverend welcome to her princely guest,
Whose inward ill no outward harm express'd:
............
So shalt thou feed on Death, that feeds on men,
And, Death once dead, there's no more dying then.
Although he started a sentence with So many times in his long poem "The Rape of Lucrece", although in a way that really is not the modern use of "so..."
Example:
This earthly saint, adored by this devil,
Little suspecteth the false worshipper;
For unstain'd thoughts do seldom dream on evil;
Birds never limed no secret bushes fear:
So guiltless she securely gives good cheer
And reverend welcome to her princely guest,
Whose inward ill no outward harm express'd:
Literally I've noticed like, that 'So...' it's like literally dying out now like there's literally other like annoying habits that're very like common now... LITERALLY! 😡
Not being a native speaker I can’t add much to this discussion, but I believe that there is a bad influence from our side, that has some impact. Large number of non natives, interacting through modern communication platforms (X, Facebook, forums, TikTok …) sets a lot of bad examples that simply became ‘acceptable’ to young, or even thought to be right.
Not much different from ‘Repeat a lie hundred times and it will be accepted as truth’.
Not much different from ‘Repeat a lie hundred times and it will be accepted as truth’.
I often use it in an article as a lead from one to the next. Like:
"We set the bias at 12mA. So, the anode voltage will drop ..."
Instead of "Therefore...
Is that wrong?
Jan
You are using "so" to relate back to the previous sentence. In this case it is synonymous with "therefore" and hence permissible.
If you want to check that it's grammatically correct to start a sentence with "so", try replacing it with "therefore" to see if it makes sense.
If you want to check that it's grammatically correct to start a sentence with "so", try replacing it with "therefore" to see if it makes sense.
May I add that there should not be a comma after the "so" in the above instance.
However, "so" should be followed by a comma if it is used as a filler word at the beginning of a sentence.