The only thing I understand is you guys are saying it's OK to model pyramidal segments and build a 2 parallel sided enclosure. I don't need to have measured any enclosures or have a PhD in acoustics to know that situation is not correct. My initial argument is, if you are not building a pyramidal enclosure, then don't use CON or EXP in HR. It's basic knowledge that a rectangle is not a cone or pyramid.
I stated a parabolic enclosure can have exponential expansion, meaning the CSA's can go 2cm2, 4cm2, 16cm2, etc and the segment lengths can go 2cm, 4cm, 16cm, etc. The 2 parallel sides kills the exponential performance. How is that not understanding?
It's funny how I provided links to articles and an actual conical horn build that say the same thing, yet I'm the one not understanding.
Geez, I can't believe I forgot to mention...PAIR and PARAlleL are in the word PARAboLIc. 2 is key. You guys really need to watch that video I posted.
There are no pairs or parallels in conical or exponential.
I stated a parabolic enclosure can have exponential expansion, meaning the CSA's can go 2cm2, 4cm2, 16cm2, etc and the segment lengths can go 2cm, 4cm, 16cm, etc. The 2 parallel sides kills the exponential performance. How is that not understanding?
It's funny how I provided links to articles and an actual conical horn build that say the same thing, yet I'm the one not understanding.
Geez, I can't believe I forgot to mention...PAIR and PARAlleL are in the word PARAboLIc. 2 is key. You guys really need to watch that video I posted.
There are no pairs or parallels in conical or exponential.