Groner's Low noise measurement amp from Linear Audio vol 3 - spare boards?

Oops I think dBV is the appropriate scale. Here is 'shorted with 1k resistor' overlaid on 'shorted'.
 

Attachments

  • 1k.jpg
    1k.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 641
* All JFETs are forced to operate at the same Vgs (as source and gate are shorted together). They will only operate at equal drain current, and thus very similar transconductance, if their "standalone" Vgs at the desired fractional drain current is matched.

Pin 3/4 of J102 go to pin 2/3 of the output XLR.

Samuel

Samuel have you tried a Monte Carlo simulation? The noise for a typical 2 or even 3X Idss range has a very small variance with no matching. Mr. O. Papa built a phono front end with masses of unmatched BF862's. By the time you get to the fourth root of Id the variation is pretty small.
 
Last edited:
This what I see on my scope when I probe the output with input shorted. DC coupled. Probe on 3. Gnd spring on 4.

I've checked all the components and solder joints again. Nothing obviously wrong. :(
 

Attachments

  • NewFile3.png
    NewFile3.png
    45.9 KB · Views: 600
  • IMG_1080.JPG
    IMG_1080.JPG
    229.7 KB · Views: 619
Samuel have you tried a Monte Carlo simulation? The noise for a typical 2 or even 3X Idss range has a very small variance with no matching. Mr. O. Papa built a phono front end with masses of unmatched BF862's. By the time you get to the fourth root of Id the variation is pretty small.

I don't recall the details--the design phase is years back. I agree that the voltage noise as function of mismatch is pretty benign. On the other hand, sensitivity to secondary noise sources should be a second rooth function (directly related to gm), so a bit more critical.

I ran the measurements again. 1k resistor in green. Shorted input brown.

Looking good!

Samuel
 
Could you tell me how you managed to measure down to -180 dB.

The scaling is (essentially) arbitrary in this plot--the ratio (difference in dB) between the two measurements matters. If the FFT size is made larger, the bins get narrower and the noise drops (less noise energy per bin). Arbitrarily low noise floors are possible that way. If you want to measure noise with an FFT, you need special scaling to compensate for this--unfortunately many software packages don't support this. A commonly misunderstud topic.

Samuel
 
I only now had time to connect my signal generator. I dialled in 10mVpp. I connected my scope to the output of the pre amp and selected it to measure Vpp. Divisions: 2ms and 5V. From 50Hz all the way through to about 130kHz or so it displayed Vpp of 10.6-8V (it flickered between the two). Above about 130kHz occasionally 10.4Vpp would be displayed, more often as I increased frequency. At 10Hz (1s per division) Vpp was a constant 10.6V.

Samuel, can you please expand on your last comment? So there's no remotely reliable vertical scale? How would one determine, for example, the line rejection of a measured power supply if there's no reference for noise floor?

PS: I did indeed change the foam I was using
 
Last edited:
I only now had time to connect my signal generator.
100 kHz at such high output levels will probably drive the amplifier into slew-rate limiting. If the purpose is to measure frequency response, I'd reduce the input level to about 1 mV (peak, peak-peak or RMS).

Samuel, can you please expand on your last comment? So there's no remotely reliable vertical scale? How would one determine, for example, the line rejection of a measured power supply if there's no reference for noise floor?
The considerations apply to random signals only. Residual ripple in a voltage regualtor is a steady-state signal, related to the mains frequency; it is measured correctly with standard FFT settings. If unsure what you're looking at, you can double (half) the FFT size. Random noise will drop (rise) by 3 dB. The level of a steady-state signal won't change.

Recommended reading: The Fundamentals of FFT-Based Signal Analysis and Measurement in LabVIEW and LabWindows/CVI. The topic of noise scaling is adressed in section 4, but it's probably wise to go through the entire text.

Samuel
 
Thanks. Yes, the intention was to just do a quick check of the build with respect to gain and frequency response. I just kept dialling higher frequency until I saw a drop in output. It seems 4mVpp is the lowest my new signal generator will go. (I thought its specs went down to 2mV but it seems not...)

Thanks. I will definitely read the linked text.
 
I built a version of Self's low noise balanced to single-ended input. I'd like to measure the noise performance of this board but I am somewhat confused as to exactly how to do so. Clearly I need to power it up and apply a signal to the input, and measure the output. I have available to me an ESI Juli@ sound card with balanced inputs, ARTA, a signal generator and this amplifier. Any guidance appreciated.
 
Last edited:
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
I built a version of Self's low noise balanced to single-ended input. I'd like to measure the noise performance of this board but I am somewhat confused as to exactly how to do so. Clearly I need to power it up and apply a signal to the input, and measure the output. I have available to me an ESI Juli@ sound card with balanced inputs, ARTA, a signal generator and this amplifier. Any guidance appreciated.

If you want to measure noise you don't need an input signal. Generally you terminate the input with a resistance that mimics the expected source resistance, then measure output noise, divide by gain and that gives you input-referred noise.
Or short the input is you want the noise of the amp itself only.

Jan
 
Ok that makes sense. When you say terminate the input do you simply mean a resistor to ground (i.e. across the inputs)? (E.g. 50R)

For SNR I'd need an input signal, no? I've never found a good source for guidance on how to conduct the plethora of tests one might need/want in diyAudio. Any references appreciated.

Looks like I've managed to damage my Juli@ XTe and I just found out when I went to purchase another that they're not making them anymore. I'm fuming. My Mac Pro can only take PCIe and that card was really very effective. (Cards like the Asus Sonar STX don't work in a Mac.) I also use the digital section of the XTe in my audio server. Hopefully that doesn't stop working...
 
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Ok that makes sense. When you say terminate the input do you simply mean a resistor to ground (i.e. across the inputs)? (E.g. 50R)

For SNR I'd need an input signal, no? I've never found a good source for guidance on how to conduct the plethora of tests one might need/want in diyAudio. Any references appreciated.

Looks like I've managed to damage my Juli@ XTe and I just found out when I went to purchase another that they're not making them anymore. I'm fuming. My Mac Pro can only take PCIe and that card was really very effective. (Cards like the Asus Sonar STX don't work in a Mac.) I also use the digital section of the XTe in my audio server. Hopefully that doesn't stop working...

Yes terminate the input.

For S/N you can measure noise with shorted input, say you measure 10uV at the output. Then if you have a hypothetical output signal of 1V, that is 1/100000th of noise, so S/N ratio for that 1V would be -100dB.

If your amp gain is 100, your input-referred noise is 100nV. That 1V output signal would need 10mV input and with the 100nV is the same S/N of -100dB.

Don't think too much - it's quite intuitive ;)

Jan
 
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Ok I think I have it. Thanks. I've yet to become intuitive thinking with dB (and scientific notation for that matter).

If anyone has a source for SMD NJM4580 please do let me know as I can't find them anywhere...

In voltage, every factor of 10 is 20dB. Factor of 100,000? Five zeroes = 5 times 20dB = 100dB of course ;)
Depending on whether it is 10x (+20dB) or 1/10th (-10dB).

So, 1000x is +60dB, 1/1000 is -60dB.

Jan
 
Thx

Another noise question if I may. My sound card needs a new op amp. The OAs en situe are NJM4580C judging from the markings. I can't find these but the NJM4580 seem to be available. Link to New Japan Radio website.

These look to be the same in every way except supply (non C version has wider supply range), ft and noise. With respect to the latter, the non-C has noise described as "0.8μVrms typ." while the C version has "5nV/√Hz typ. at f=1kHz". Is there a way to compare these?