Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)

So, does anyone have a nice method to add an baffle to an ath produced waveguide and simulate it like that instead? It would be nice to compare the results :)

You can see my efforts at this sort of thing here 2 way waveguide speaker build ABEC modelling

It is easy enough when you get the hang of it and have a base template in place but the learning curve is steep to start.

Depending on the size of the guide depends on how much symmetry is needed to make the solve time reasonable. I used 1/4 on the waveguide to simulate baffle width and diffraction, but 1/2 for the woofer in the full size cabinet.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Got it! Makes sense why there appear to be some ripples/diffraction from the edge in that case. I've done similar simulations with circsym and a dome tweeter profile and they appear much smoother due to the infinite baffle.
Yeah, and this is not a particularly well terminated example (and still quite small).

- Some pretty pictures (2 dB step) :)
 

Attachments

  • fs-2,5k.PNG
    fs-2,5k.PNG
    30.9 KB · Views: 396
  • fs-5k.PNG
    fs-5k.PNG
    36.6 KB · Views: 391
  • fs-7,5k.PNG
    fs-7,5k.PNG
    39.2 KB · Views: 388
  • fs-10k.PNG
    fs-10k.PNG
    37.4 KB · Views: 390
  • fs-15k.PNG
    fs-15k.PNG
    34.5 KB · Views: 396
  • fs-20k.PNG
    fs-20k.PNG
    29.9 KB · Views: 111
Last edited:
You can see my efforts at this sort of thing here 2 way waveguide speaker build ABEC modelling

It is easy enough when you get the hang of it and have a base template in place but the learning curve is steep to start.

Depending on the size of the guide depends on how much symmetry is needed to make the solve time reasonable. I used 1/4 on the waveguide to simulate baffle width and diffraction, but 1/2 for the woofer in the full size cabinet.

Thanks I'll have a look.

Regarding the optimisation discussion, is it relevant to simulate the infinite baffle scenario when the application is in a baffled speaker? Or is it safe to say that the optimum solution in an infinite baffle also will be the optimum solution for a baffled case?
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
From my experience I think it is pretty safe to say that a waveguide that's good in IB remains good in an enclosure that is properly rounded. I can't really imagine optimizing a waveguide for a sub-optimal enclosure. The infinite baffle is definitely a good starting point. It's also faster to compute than a full enclosure model - this is not a small thing.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
You go in the good direction. What you want is to eliminate all reflections from the picture. This is done by applying a time window to the measured impulse response and calculating frequency response from that. I don't use REW but I know it is possible there. Try to trace the first reflection that arrives to the microphone after the direct sound. The aim is to get this time gap as long as possible by placing the speaker AND the microphone far from any boundaries. You'll quickly learn this.

BTW, even from the current pucture it is obvious that the waveguide is virtually perfect. Congratulations ;)
 
Last edited:
Do you know if there is an idiots guide to understanding what is the expectation in a wavelet spectrogram.

1/12th resolution
6ms before peak
10ms after peak

Or what ranges to use on the chart in order to see what needs to be seen? ;-)
 

Attachments

  • 0 spectro.jpg
    0 spectro.jpg
    242.3 KB · Views: 255
Last edited: