Is that a problem? I don't understand where's the "catch".As the preferred crossover is around, ideally below 1000 Hz, here's a (hypothetical) catch:
1. Required voltage @ 800Hz for the horns with low vs. high loading.
...
One of the last additions to the OS-SE formula was the 'k' parameter. Basically, by increasing this value above 1.0 it's possible to use an OS profile that would otherwise correspond to a bigger throat (and vice versa).
The attached images show the results for k = 1, 2 and 5.
The overall waveguide diameter was about 10.5", a bigger k also makes the waveguide a little longer.
The attached images show the results for k = 1, 2 and 5.
The overall waveguide diameter was about 10.5", a bigger k also makes the waveguide a little longer.
Attachments
I have a few if you don't mind:
1. What are typical values for Mmd and Bl for a 1 inch CD like the DE250 and/or DE500?
2. What's the distance between the diaphragm and phase plug for the above drivers? I used 0.5mm in my (extremely) simplified model. 1mm seems to roll off the highs too much.
3. What is the compression ratio in the above drivers? Mabat suggested 8-10.
I think that you misunderstood my comment. I analyzed a generic CD with a model with the intent of developing a new one. I have not analyzed any specific devices so I don't know any specific device parameters. I can show the effect of any parameter, but not what those parameters actually are in a real device.
Yes, increasing the gap reduces the HFs but increases the excursion capability. This is the point that I made earlier.
I would guess "typical" Mmd to be 6-10 grams and BL of about 20 Nt/amp, but I don't know for sure. The "gap is usually about 1 mm (I would guess) and sets the limit for excursion. Compression ratios are what Mabat suggests.
Last edited:
Someone tried to model DE250 in this thread (2009): Modelling compression drivers
Featuring Dr. Geddes as well: Modelling compression drivers
There's also a mention of TAD TD-2001: Modelling compression drivers
Code:
Ree=6.3; |Voice coil resistance [ohm] ......(Re)
Le=0.11e-3; |Voice coil inductance [H] ......(Le)
Bl=9.3; |Motor conversion factor F=Bl*i [Tm]......(BL)
Mms=1.4e-3; |Mechanical mass [kg] ......(Mms)
Rms=.5; |Mechanical resistance [Ns/m] ......(Rms)
Cms=30e-6; |Mechanical compliance [m/N] ......(Cms)
Featuring Dr. Geddes as well: Modelling compression drivers
There's also a mention of TAD TD-2001: Modelling compression drivers
Last edited:
Is that a problem? I don't understand where's the "catch".
The catch, imo, is that some 1" drivers are better suited to low crossover points - say between 800 and 1000 Hz - than others.
If you want to cross a 1" driver really low, < 800 Hz, you'll need a specific driver and often also a deep horn. I've seen examples of TADs TD-2001 that were used from around 500 Hz.
The DE250 for instance, does take 900 Hz, but definitely not 500 Hz.
One might argue, why not use a bigger driver?
That was my argument before, but lately I've been taking a more balanced view.
In this context, Legis experiments with the TAD TD4001, FaitalPro HF1440 and the HF108 coupled to his Yuichi horns, are interesting.
Last edited:
To me a 'better suited' for lower crossover point means that it can take large enough excursions with less distortion. I can't see a connection with voltage. In the example presented before the voltage needed at 800 Hz was about the same (for the same output) as around 5 - 6 kHz...
Of course, excursion is important, as it is related to the magnet structure and diaphragm characteristics.
Bigger (more powerful, lighter, stiffer, or better (diaphram) damping) translates to less excursion and also higher efficiency, implying lower voltage.
Pet007's measurements show the DE250 generates more output below 1000Hz, compared to the Celestion and Sica.
Bigger (more powerful, lighter, stiffer, or better (diaphram) damping) translates to less excursion and also higher efficiency, implying lower voltage.
Pet007's measurements show the DE250 generates more output below 1000Hz, compared to the Celestion and Sica.
Last edited:
Code:Mms=1.4e-3; |Mechanical mass [kg] ......(Mms)
1.4 gram moving mass seems unlikely to me as it has to include the voice coil. That's a very small mass.
If you want to cross a 1" driver really low, < 800 Hz, you'll need a specific driver and often also a deep horn. I've seen examples of TADs TD-2001 that were used from around 500 Hz.
The DE250 for instance, does take 900 Hz, but definitely not 500 Hz.
In my NS-15 I use a DE250 or DE500 down to about 800 Hz without issue.
Actually I think this mass is possible.1.4 gram moving mass seems unlikely to me as it has to include the voice coil. That's a very small mass.
I tried to calculate it based on rough estimates of the volumes and it was about 1:1, titanium diaphragm : copper voice coil, around 1.5 g total. So I don't have a problem with that number.
JBL states 3.5 g for 4" titanium diaphragm in JBL 2445: https://jblpro.com/en/site_elements/tech-note-characteristics-of-high-frequency-compression-drivers
JBL states 3.5 g for 4" titanium diaphragm in JBL 2445: https://jblpro.com/en/site_elements/tech-note-characteristics-of-high-frequency-compression-drivers
Last edited:
I have not analyzed any specific devices so I don't know any specific device parameters. I can show the effect of any parameter, but not what those parameters actually are in a real device.
Understood. I thought you might have measured the parameters for the DE250 and/or DE500 since you've used them a lot. Thanks for the reply anyway.
JBL states 3.5 g for 4" titanium diaphragm in JBL 2445: https://jblpro.com/en/site_elements/tech-note-characteristics-of-high-frequency-compression-drivers
I actually found that document recently and was going to link it, but I guess you beat me to it
Ah, is it something new? For sound reproduction?I was afraid of that question because I can't say.
Understood. I thought you might have measured the parameters for the DE250 and/or DE500 since you've used them a lot. Thanks for the reply anyway.
I did, a long time ago, but I just don't know where they might be now. Back some time here at DIY, I described how I measured them, I thought that I posted some values.
Ah, is it something new? For sound reproduction?
Can't say.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)