Will we see the board Russ displayed in post #1097 on sale at some point? ![Wink ;) ;)]()
TheShaman said:Will we see the board Russ displayed in post #1097 on sale at some point?![]()
I am also interested in this. I can't source etching materials where I am so I may just go ahead and try to breadboard one of the simpler versions myself. Always a first for everything
Could you let me know how much current each counterpoint draws.
About 120mA per channel.
fff0 said:
May I know if there is an indicative schedule for the next batch?
Not yet. We will post details as we have them, but we are going to go as fast as we can.
The discussion about usb/DAC interfaces moved here:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1807617#post1807617
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1807617#post1807617
Sorry for this - its a crosspost! Mods delete if thats the right thing to do.
I got a major upgrade in sound by dropping the size of the resistor on the LCBPS to 1R5 - I posted up details over at twisted pear forum.
Again, sorry for the croisspost, but I thought it would be of interest to counterpoint owners.
Fran
I got a major upgrade in sound by dropping the size of the resistor on the LCBPS to 1R5 - I posted up details over at twisted pear forum.
Again, sorry for the croisspost, but I thought it would be of interest to counterpoint owners.
Fran
mikelm said:Can u post a link for ur comments please - I cannot find them - thx
http://www.twistedpearaudio.com/forum/default.aspx?g=posts&t=616&p=3
As I understand it, the kits are still classed as beta since they have not been tested in a wide enough array of applications. Also not fully tested wrt to SE use either, although it presents no probs in my set up. I did have to use a cap on the output though cos of some DC offset.
Russ or Brian should probably comment here.
Counterpoint gives a more refined sound, and a soundstage with more depth and tangible reality to it. All this is in my setup etc etc. ie YMMV.
No going back for me though. I now have 2 IVYs here!
Fran
Russ or Brian should probably comment here.
Counterpoint gives a more refined sound, and a soundstage with more depth and tangible reality to it. All this is in my setup etc etc. ie YMMV.
No going back for me though. I now have 2 IVYs here!
Fran
Fran, I had the same thoughts the first time I tried the DAC straight into my 300b valve power amps. e.g. Good but lacking a little warmth.
However after a while of going back through my usual passive TVC pre, I went back to a direct connection and found I really liked it. Every time I switched back to using the TVC I felt I was missing the attack and detail of the direct connection. Now I don't know why the change, burn in, old age hearing, or just I've convinced myself, but I do use it direct now.
I guess it helps if your amps don't need much to get them going?
Russ
However after a while of going back through my usual passive TVC pre, I went back to a direct connection and found I really liked it. Every time I switched back to using the TVC I felt I was missing the attack and detail of the direct connection. Now I don't know why the change, burn in, old age hearing, or just I've convinced myself, but I do use it direct now.
I guess it helps if your amps don't need much to get them going?
Russ
square wave response
Back in post Post #1886 mikelm posted a 1kHz. square wave.
Can anyone else CONFIRM his image as being proper?
(an not an error of implementation or opamp output?)
Also, can anyone measure the time in usecs or msecs of the little transient overshoot shown on the edges of the square wave?? (assuming it is there when you test)
Thanks in advance...
_-_-bear
mikelm said:
Here is a 1khz square wave full output - please excuse the shadow - my ancient scope is on it's last legs.
A 10khz square looks more like a sine with some irregularities but my scope would not trigger it so I cannot post a coherent image
Back in post Post #1886 mikelm posted a 1kHz. square wave.
Can anyone else CONFIRM his image as being proper?
(an not an error of implementation or opamp output?)
Also, can anyone measure the time in usecs or msecs of the little transient overshoot shown on the edges of the square wave?? (assuming it is there when you test)
Thanks in advance...
_-_-bear
Hi bear,
the overshoot is not from the pre amp - that is stable to frequencies way higher than 1khz.
I got the square wave as a sample from the web and burnt it to a CD.
I feel fairly confident that it is accurate so u can just measure off the picture to work out the time of any bit of it.
mike
the overshoot is not from the pre amp - that is stable to frequencies way higher than 1khz.
I got the square wave as a sample from the web and burnt it to a CD.
I feel fairly confident that it is accurate so u can just measure off the picture to work out the time of any bit of it.
mike
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- More Vendors...
- Twisted Pear
- Buffalo DAC (ESS Sabre 9008)