Hi Bull,
So I think I'll forget the satellite/sub idea.
Forget all the different classifications of pc-system, hi-fi, surround,etc... They all have the same goal in producing good quality sound. They do differ in some design rules but at the end of the line they all have to have a balanced frequency response.
If the anounced options are fixed........
I would definitely go for the mini sized hi-fi amp.
In this case "size matters"😀
The only way to gain more low is "size". Afterall low means lots of air movement which can only be generated by lots of cone surface!!🙂
If you do not mind to use 6" bass-mid. (this could mean a relatively large cabinet) with a soft dome tweeter, then go for it.
No fuss x-over, probably traight 6 db cut-off.....
Combination of the two above will give you the better result.
So I think I'll forget the satellite/sub idea.
Forget all the different classifications of pc-system, hi-fi, surround,etc... They all have the same goal in producing good quality sound. They do differ in some design rules but at the end of the line they all have to have a balanced frequency response.
If the anounced options are fixed........
I would definitely go for the mini sized hi-fi amp.
In this case "size matters"😀
The only way to gain more low is "size". Afterall low means lots of air movement which can only be generated by lots of cone surface!!🙂
If you do not mind to use 6" bass-mid. (this could mean a relatively large cabinet) with a soft dome tweeter, then go for it.
No fuss x-over, probably traight 6 db cut-off.....
Combination of the two above will give you the better result.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.