Dear sir you were talking about valve tubes & others amplifier designs that i cannot understand. I dont have any knowledge about valve tubes. So i did not post any comment here. But you may continue your discussion.here on the forum there are ready-made solutions for repetition; many have been setting up modes for years to get a high-quality amplifier.
Judging by the author’s posts, it will take him at least 5 years to create something of his own.
It is best to use a ready-made solution, and even better when the author of the finished amplifier is here on the forum and can suggest the nuances
Last edited:
I agree you can explain and share your ideas with us we will like to see your ideas.Why you talk about “progressive compensation” if you can't explain it here, this is DIY forum and poeple like to built.
According to experts tubes have soft clipping. When no clipping occurs, they sound in the same way as transistors.Is there any transistor amplifier that is very close to tube amplifier?
Tubes have higher thd than transistors but tubes sounds good as compare to the transistors.1According to experts tubes have soft clipping. When no clipping occurs, they sound in the same way as transistors.
Why do you care so much? maybe it has commercial value?Why you talk about “progressive compensation” if you can't explain it here,
you “talk” about this, I use it, so I give it as an example in the dialogue, the technique is easy to understand, and this is not the option that you use in your amplifiers. If it is not clear, re-read my posts above again, but this is not necessary.
very good, I try not to interfere if a person is doing something and the scheme has no obvious contradictionsthis is DIY forum and poeple like to built.
I spoke about lamps only in the context of test comparisons, because there were many of them and there was a corresponding laboratory and even an anechoic chamber, although it turned out to be useless in tests.Dear sir you were talking about valve tubes & others amplifier designs that i cannot understand.
Not for everyone and not always, for more than 10 years of blind test comparisons, the tube amplifier of the amateur radio assembly has not received first place. It is much easier to make a high-quality transistor amplifier with basic amateur radio skills.Tubes have higher thd than transistors but tubes sounds good as compare to the transistors.
They "aced" it then. There has been no real advancements in AB topology in 50 years. "Lin' topology was 1972. Japanese refined it through the 80"s.This is the quality level of Hi-Fi from the 70s of the last century)))
All we do here is apply what has already been done to modern devices and hope for PPM.
Your point ?? Where is your 21'st century breakthrough ?
Pass , Curl .... just cult followings redoing what was already done by trial and error in the 80's by Japanese EE's.
"21st century" - WHAT ? ... class D ?? Emotiva and many others say "amp is lighter - new tech" Just an excuse to increase profit margin and
be able to outsource to Asia.
Also , if any particular topology can hit 20Khz PPM performance with less NFB , great ! Some "audiophools" prefer NO feedback designs -
say they sound "better" ?? Or class A .... heat the room up - definitly not "green".
Most any classic design with any (reasonable) amount of NFB drops down to 20-30PPM 20Khz THD. Going "deep NFB" just gives the diminishing returns of single digit PPM. You will never hear that difference.
Same old stuff , no real advancement ... "High end" is a delusion , subjective at best.birth of the "High End" concept 1967
birth of the concept of "Ultra deep NFB" 1998
Ease of sourcing , stability , price . There are more important criteria.
I have no aversion to SMPS supplies for class AB , these tend to improve performance , cost less.
OS
progress is happening, you yourself are using generally very high-quality solutions.They "aced" it then. There has been no real advancements in AB topology in 50 years.
Sorry, "Lin' topology was 1956"Lin' topology was 1972.
I agree sir you are right.Not for everyone and not always, for more than 10 years of blind test comparisons, the tube amplifier of the amateur radio assembly has not received first place. It is much easier to make a high-quality transistor amplifier with basic amateur radio skills.
@Zohaib Ahmad
Have you done any changes to this amplifier in your first post?
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/attachments/100-watt-png.1272367/
Have you done any changes to this amplifier in your first post?
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/attachments/100-watt-png.1272367/
These were Americans and British. The Japanese were only engaged in manufacturing.Japanese refined it through the 80"s.
I use them too))))I have no aversion to SMPS supplies for class AB ,
Sir can you kindly explain in details. What is progressive correction compensation?Don’t mislead the forum, you seem to be doing this on purpose because you don’t understand the essence of progressive correction (compensation for you).
We have digressed into semantics.I think this topic is a long way from the OP amplifier suggestion.
Isn't it?
Yes , just review all those wonderful classic Japanese designs from the 80's. They "aced" it way back then.
We DO have better parts now !!
OS
only basic 3 points:Sir can you kindly explain in details. What is progressive correction compensation?
1. maximum linear gain open loop of each stage, especially the input stages.
2. compensation outside the feedback circuits, local frequency feedback is also not suitable
3. the most linear output power cascade - as a rule, this is the Lokanti cascade.
We are not considering the remaining points regarding thermal stability and a stable operating point.
not to go too deep into the topic
Last edited:
Better parts. I pick and choose those 80's "solutions" and apply them to 21'st century devices.progress is happening, you yourself are using generally very high-quality solutions.
OS
Dear line up sir.@Zohaib Ahmad
Have you done any changes to this amplifier in your first post?
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/attachments/100-watt-png.1272367/
Wg-ski sir said me to post the pdf file of amplifier in the thread. He said that he will modify the schematic.
You can do this well, but an NFB depth that exceeds 100 dB at a frequency of 20 kHz will not work with these circuits.Better parts. I pick and choose those 80's "solutions" and apply them to 21'st century devices.
lokanti cascade, progressive correction, ultra deep nfb
I don't believe a word you say 🤣
I don't believe a word you say 🤣
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Solid State
- High quality class AB 100 watt amp