High quality class AB 100 watt amp

here on the forum there are ready-made solutions for repetition; many have been setting up modes for years to get a high-quality amplifier.
Judging by the author’s posts, it will take him at least 5 years to create something of his own.
It is best to use a ready-made solution, and even better when the author of the finished amplifier is here on the forum and can suggest the nuances
Dear sir you were talking about valve tubes & others amplifier designs that i cannot understand. I dont have any knowledge about valve tubes. So i did not post any comment here. But you may continue your discussion.
 
Last edited:
Why you talk about “progressive compensation” if you can't explain it here,
Why do you care so much? maybe it has commercial value?
you “talk” about this, I use it, so I give it as an example in the dialogue, the technique is easy to understand, and this is not the option that you use in your amplifiers. If it is not clear, re-read my posts above again, but this is not necessary.
this is DIY forum and poeple like to built.
very good, I try not to interfere if a person is doing something and the scheme has no obvious contradictions
 
This is the quality level of Hi-Fi from the 70s of the last century)))
They "aced" it then. There has been no real advancements in AB topology in 50 years. "Lin' topology was 1972. Japanese refined it through the 80"s.
All we do here is apply what has already been done to modern devices and hope for PPM.
Your point ?? Where is your 21'st century breakthrough ?
Pass , Curl .... just cult followings redoing what was already done by trial and error in the 80's by Japanese EE's.

"21st century" - WHAT ? ... class D ?? Emotiva and many others say "amp is lighter - new tech" Just an excuse to increase profit margin and
be able to outsource to Asia.
Also , if any particular topology can hit 20Khz PPM performance with less NFB , great ! Some "audiophools" prefer NO feedback designs -
say they sound "better" ?? Or class A .... heat the room up - definitly not "green".
Most any classic design with any (reasonable) amount of NFB drops down to 20-30PPM 20Khz THD. Going "deep NFB" just gives the diminishing returns of single digit PPM. You will never hear that difference.
birth of the "High End" concept 1967
birth of the concept of "Ultra deep NFB" 1998
Same old stuff , no real advancement ... "High end" is a delusion , subjective at best.
Ease of sourcing , stability , price . There are more important criteria.

I have no aversion to SMPS supplies for class AB , these tend to improve performance , cost less.
OS
 
Sir can you kindly explain in details. What is progressive correction compensation?
only basic 3 points:
1. maximum linear gain open loop of each stage, especially the input stages.
2. compensation outside the feedback circuits, local frequency feedback is also not suitable
3. the most linear output power cascade - as a rule, this is the Lokanti cascade.

We are not considering the remaining points regarding thermal stability and a stable operating point.
not to go too deep into the topic
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zohaib Ahmad