ZM's 2SK2087C musings, phase two - SissySIT (42) as a cradle

Member
Joined 2019
Paid Member
For a bit of fun, I swapped out my monolithic diode bridges for a couple of LT4320 bridges I made a while back. Point being, I wanted to get a bit more voltage out of the PSU. Went from 27V to 28.5V, so a bit more. I lowered the Iq to 1A7 to compensate for total dissipation. Ended up with a slight THD reduction (.12%, now .11%). While making the RTA's, I experimented with Iq to see how it impacted THD in real time. Interestingly, the span from 1A5 to 2A Iq gave the exact same THD results. Then I remembered the autoformers – its it fair to say they dominant the THD values here, ZM?
 

Attachments

  • Sissy42-rta02.jpg
    Sissy42-rta02.jpg
    132.1 KB · Views: 124
  • Sissy42-rta.jpg
    Sissy42-rta.jpg
    96.2 KB · Views: 128
  • C0C23E05-7B63-4B4A-A4A1-4F4F48F5F8EE.jpeg
    C0C23E05-7B63-4B4A-A4A1-4F4F48F5F8EE.jpeg
    410 KB · Views: 120
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Official Court Jester
Joined 2003
Paid Member
buffer + autoformers are adding some (iron usually blamed for 3rd, not even ones) , but be absolutely sure that OS is greatest THD generator there

why you're asking?

SissySIT is perfect result of all projected goals, main of them being DEFiSIT for Masses (read - UberGreedy Boyz)

if you want something with lesser THD, build another amp
 
For a bit of fun, I swapped out my monolithic diode bridges for a couple of LT4320 bridges I made a while back. Point being, I wanted to get a bit more voltage out of the PSU. Went from 27V to 28.5V, so a bit more. I lowered the Iq to 1A7 to compensate for total dissipation. Ended up with a slight THD reduction (.12%, now .11%). While making the RTA's, I experimented with Iq to see how it impacted THD in real time. Interestingly, the span from 1A5 to 2A Iq gave the exact same THD results. Then I remembered the autoformers – its it fair to say they dominant the THD values here, ZM?
HI ,I see more 60Hz 27 vs 28.5v , is LT4320 better relate gremlins by diode? tnx