This doesn't follow from the data.Regarding the T34-A; an (unmodified) OS-throat is probably not the best interface for the concave surround. It's basically a cavity that's extended axially by the OS-profile and likely the cause of sub-optimal performance in the treble range.
Convex surround:
Concave surround:
It's just that the OS profile doesn't fit to the source shape and velocity.
Attachments
I can model anything defined by a source definition script. If you (or anyone else) provide this I can try it. The problem is that the real diaphragm may not be moving as a rigid body - then the simulation won't be correct. With the tweeters above, this simple assumption (used throughout ABEC) is fulfilled to a large degree, at least in the audio band. I'd be not so sure with a bigger driver.
Now it starts making more sense - this is still a conical throat, only narrower than before (this is ~60 deg, the previous was ~100). So it is not the OS profile per se but a non-matching profile in general.
Attachments
Last edited:
This doesn't follow from the data.
Convex surround: ...
Concave surround: ...
It's just that the OS profile doesn't fit to the source shape and velocity.
Yes, either convex or concave - depending on the size and shape of the surround, an OS throat is not ideal for the wavefront emitted from the "average dome tweeter". However, this doesn't imply that an OS throat cannot work with all dome tweeters.
Guys! Can someone translate from post 922's ath pre 4.5 coding to 4.5 Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)
Mine convert ended twice the size or so, also would someone post some complete cfg's to get a quicker feeling for things! Thanks![Smile :) :)]()
Mine convert ended twice the size or so, also would someone post some complete cfg's to get a quicker feeling for things! Thanks
So here is the correct simulation, i.e. with axial motion of the diaphragm (normalized at 30 deg):.. this was not a simulation of a dome tweeter but a pulsating source...
A pulsating source remains the holy grail
Attachments
Last edited:
The Vifa/Peerless plastic-tip ring radiators are said to be quite well performing in waveguides. I'd be very interested to see how they work.I'll also try to cover the surround with the waveguide somehow but I'm afraid that will not improve things that much. So far I haven't tried to model any ring radiators.
Keep up the awesome work!
Marcel, have you tried reducing the throat radius so it covers part of the surround? I tried this years ago for an old speaker project and saw some improvement. The tweeter I used had a convex surround, so I did something like this (apologies for the crappy drawing):
Attachments
You mean the radius of the sphere? Measure the radius and height of the cap and calculate the rest: R_sphere = (r^2 + h^2) / 2hAnyone know an easy way to measure the radius of these domes?
If I wanted to be sure, I would draw the contour in a CAD, print it in scale, cut it and try if it fits.
Last edited:
Not yet but the tool now allows that quite easily so I will probably leave that for others who want to play with it. I'm almost finished with the user guide so this new version should be released soon.Marcel, have you tried reducing the throat radius so it covers part of the surround?
Last edited:
Finished the User Guide for 4.6, so before I prepare the package for downloading, you can at least skim through the PDF: Ath 4.6.0 - User Guide
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)