Define Subwoofer?

Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Randy you are a bass player so: ever played a 2x15" cab and a 4x10" ( same box loading/low freq limit) in direct comparison?
Both have roughly the same sd but 4x10" seems more 'dynamic' than 2x15" ime.
But once lowpassed 2x15" have 'better', 'bigger' low end.
It's all about acoustic impedance for low end and directivity behavior in mid/high for the transient/breakup (dynamic).

If for sub then box loading can make a difference as already said by Art.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by "dynamics"?
Simplified and considering eventual equalizing and unlimited power the max output is just limited by displacement, thus Sd*Xmax*number of drivers.
Hey man, how are you? I just meant how a 15" feels ina small room. My first real bedroom system as a teenager was a pair of 15" subs and PA 2-ways. Was the only 'hi-fi' that I could make from local Jaycar parts that could do a serious job with dub basslines and was my first Dj system. This thing felt so different in the way they pressurised the room, visceral! Later I replaced them with more hi-fi type Peerless 10s that had wicked looking roll surrounds but from behind looked like any cheap woofer, xlls or something like that. Cam highly recommended that would be quality bass but would just hit limits very quickly and not much power handling. None of the sense of the 15s. Even later had the same missing feeling, upgrading to a 12" Yamaha active........that the sense I mean. But that's the dynamics with physical reception of bass through the body and not as per Kiriviums query regarding the sense of quickness for live playing. That is a factor too but for my actual build and not the virtual reference for a decent 15" true subwoofer in a small box
Randy you are a bass player so: ever played a 2x15" cab and a 4x10" ( same box loading/low freq limit) in direct comparison?
Both have roughly the same sd but 4x10" seems more 'dynamic' than 2x15" ime.
But once lowpassed 2x15" have 'better', 'bigger' low end.
It's all about acoustic impedance for low end and directivity behavior in mid/high for the transient/breakup (dynamic).

If for sub then box loading can make a difference as already said by Art.
Krivium, long time, how have you been? Let's see. What you mention is prolly the proper use of the word dynamics. Here is the thing, for the Dubwoofer, I do want fast! The Ampeg that Art brought up is a stage fav by many bassists and standard gear on Rototom stage, but it's not the sound of reggae bass. The favoured system of the person on the recordings of just about most reggae is actually a 4x10+15" setup from MarkBass. I have dialled in a similar range of tones as that system using a combination of some mixers, 4x7' subs but on a lot smaller output. Of course, like the Markbass system, mine can also be plugged into whatever PA+mic'ed

Yes, for fast thumb style heavy attack, quick mutes based standard reggae riddims I feel exactly that, need quick. The new Dubwoofer mixer plugin system is going to be 4x12s (unusual ones that might just sound faster than a 10). But for personal playing, I am not yet ready to give up on what I have been able to do with the 4x7" array. These face me and I even have my foot up on it. I only play to myself though and the rest is for restarting DJ'ing and our upstart students with my daughter on the electric bass or double bass with soon a synth pickup for some student school material redone as EDM/Dub
 
Sims of a single 15 with the 60L of the dual 12s behind it looks good enough to add as 15" virtual reference. Thats the lower blue trace with the same power as the single 10 in lower red trace. The top blue trace is the dual 15 with 120L and the same power as the dual 10 in the top red trace. So four virtual reference subs now and I think at some point I want to hear a TL with these 15s

1719239286224.png


Real work can now start on the Dubwoofers :)

No reason not to keep pushing as much subwoofing into increasingly smaller boxes....any more drivers?
 
"Bass bin" is just a name with no actual size.
The usual PA industry bass bin was around 22.5" x 45" x 45", ~26 cubic feet, ~735L.
Half or 1/4 that size might be considered a "starting size".
Josh Ricci has tested tons of bass bins of all sorts outdoors- the readings are at 2meters, so add +6dB to them for the usual 1meter ground plane equivalent:
View attachment 1324408

Art

Bandpass for life!

Pro Audio bass bin = 41.2hz (4 string bass lowest note).
Subwoofer music = 27.5hz (88 key piano lowest note).
Subwoofer home theater = 20hz.
 
Thanks for the tip Art. I can't help but wonder if a rectangular cross-section with those twin flares can be folded in half without suffering?
Any fold will increase turbulence, so the effectiveness (linear output for enclosed volume) of the flared port would be reduced.
That said, it would still be more effective than a non-flared folded port.
Also, am I reading the larger ZR correctly as being too quiet for a 12"?
The blue trace in #37 reads lower than the others.
It looks like it's box may be undersized, and the tuning is lower than the red traces.
Too many variables (what is "full power", Fs, impedance, excursion,HP setting etc.) to say more from the screen shot.
 
Any fold will increase turbulence, so the effectiveness (linear output for enclosed volume) of the flared port would be reduced.
That said, it would still be more effective than a non-flared folded port.

The blue trace in #37 reads lower than the others.
It looks like it's box may be undersized, and the tuning is lower than the red traces.
Too many variables (what is "full power", Fs, impedance, excursion,HP setting etc.) to say more from the screen shot.

Ok, thanks. That's good to know about folding. That just might get me the look

Full power is driver Wrms rating, or each module is 1kw when the driver w is higher. One module per voice coil, so four modules for the dual driver systems so lower red trace is 2kw and upper is 4kw. No Eq on any of the models and all running high pass 20Hz

The ZR12.4D opening trace in WinISD was so dismal and the response so hard to flatten that I didn't bother with going into too much detail. Let's see what ails it

With a 52.8 EBP, the driver should be used in a Sealed or BP4 enclosure.


Hey man, thanks for running those, but that's not the driver. The mulish one is the ZR12.4D. I wonder how to provoke it to kick. Anyway, those numbers look good, but there is plenty of alien stuff with HR. For one thing, whats going on with that format for Cms, how does one convert to that? And so on

It looks like it's box may be undersized, and the tuning is lower than the red traces.

The box was set =Vas or 22L and tuning is = Fs or 28Hz and manipulated in all directions, but she refuses to let the 'unchit' down. !kw module on each coil for power headroom for any DSP work. The Virtuals are running 30L and 60L with 25Hz tuning

Let's go into more detail


1719270039510.png


1719270893650.png


1719271002776.png


1719271076440.png


What do you guys think? Is it simply just made for very low bass out of 22L without sheer SPL considerations? As is, seems the others are better options for intended De Fine Dubwoofer :D

https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...efficient-tops-dubwoofer.414311/#post-7718893
 
https://ds18.com/cdn/shop/files/ZR12.2D_-_ZR12.4D_-_SUBWOOFERS_MANUAL_WEB.pdf?v=360461080284055225

The datasheet shows correct values for Re for both 12.2 and 12.4 model but missing the Xmax. Earthquake Sounds way of listing Xmax makes the one way rating used by DS18 look bad!

The manuals have recently been updated online. I have saved some older manuals containing Xmax for some of their other drivers that I am interested in and these have the Xmax info

Better yet, there is a manual in the driver box

1719282720542.png
 
DS18 chose low extension and small enclosure.
That's what I noticed when running sims on the driver. Not completely a bad thing, though. My home system doesn't really pull lower than 40Hz and being ina tiny home, space is a premium. I'll do the ZR12.4D in the smallest cab that will still fit dual opposed PR. and replace my current z623 sub with this one. Even though it's not PA loud, it still manages to scrape THX and with it low reach, it should be perfect for HT and video editing tourism promos of the Bay and our three rental boats

Let's call this one the Tiny20s challenge for a later date

Find another driver maybe?

The search is on, please see the project thread and the last graphs with the green trace. This is so far creating the most noise in the allowed cab size. There will be four of these in the system, so however 4x of those green traces would sum

Any ideas on for a driver that would better the predicted SPL for the green trace there? The 30L driver volume is the max allowed and plus ports and such off course. Or in other words. Total external cab can be max 40L

https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...efficient-tops-dubwoofer.414311/#post-7719394