Discrete AD797 up and running

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
The amp with bipolar CFP input stage turned out to sound really beatiful. Warm and detailed. Smooth and laid back compared to the JFET input amps. Again it's the details such as room information/reverb effects that improved, and everything sounds cleaner. It measures well in RMAA and looks OK on the scope.

Left fft is E-mu 1212M loop-back and right is this amp with 33R load. On the scope it's 100 kHz, 1V, 33R load.

Those plots look good, glad you're happy after all that work.
 
Nelson, is this the circuit of post #78 with 2sa1016/2sc2363 throughout or input diff stage only?
Rüdiger
I use SA1016/SC2362 throughout - input stage, VAS, current mirrors, shunt transistor and the input of the diamond buffer. I love the warm yet detailed sound they produce.

I added charge suckout capacitors to the output stage not shown in the schematic.

I didn't take time to balance the currents through T1 vs the VAS and used diodes instead of R8, so the CM collector voltages aren't balanced. I haven't (yet) tried to go from shunt transistor emitter to the DB because I'm not sure if I'm willing to sacrifice any voltage swing. This amp usually run on batteries.

Low impedance voltage reference to the VAS and better output transistors are on my wish list.

Next in line to be '797-ized is the one with JFET/bipolar CFP input stage. I've run out of JFET's so it has to wait.
 
I did two more of these. This time I balanced the CM collector voltages as suggested by Samuel.

The one with standard bipolar input sounds as expected - like the bipolar CFP only not quite as good.

The JFET/bipolar CFP is a bit disappointing, because it was my favourite before adding the floating CM and shunt transistor. Now it's on the bright side. This is the only amp where I don't use SA1016/SC2362 everywhere. I had to use SC2240 as shunt transistors. I wonder if it could have such an impact. I have to try to find some SC2362's.

Is it a good idea to use a cap from the bases of the folded cascode transistors to positive rail or ground? Something like 10 nF. It simulates better, especially at unity gain (the ground channels in my amps are unity gain).
 

Attachments

  • bipolar.jpg
    bipolar.jpg
    149.1 KB · Views: 831
  • JFET_bipolar.jpg
    JFET_bipolar.jpg
    142.2 KB · Views: 831
I wonder if it could have such an impact.
I sacrificed some SC2362 from another project. Now the amp sounds like I expected from the AD797-izing it. It still is brighter than the bipolar version, but not as edgy. Those Toshiba transistors aren't to my taste.

Even my favourite opamp based amp with OPA827 (and sometimes AD797) and OPA627 as ground put these to shame. Before adding the floating CM and shunt transistor, OPA827/627 had a better soundstage and was overall cleaner.
 
I'm confused with which components you are swapping and to which schematic you attribute the different sounds.
When I come home from work I'll show the up-to-date schematics.

In short it seems like balancing the CM collector voltages by using a small resistor on the T1 emitter instead of a diode make the amp sound erroneous - too bright - and there's an "undershoot" in the square wave. Like stated earlier in this thread, the CM probably needs a little more voltage to operate properly.

Using a SC2240 instead of SC2362 as T1 (shunt) transistor makes the amp sound worse. I've come to the same conlusion when I've used SA970/SC2240 as input stage or VAS in this and other amps.

TzeYang, I'll do a summary after some more listening. I have five of these amps with different input stages: bipolar, JFET, JFET/bipolar CFP, bipolar/bipolar CFP, JFET/JFET cascode. I also have two un-'797-ized, one with JFET and one with bipolar input stage.
 
Using a SC2240 instead of SC2362 as T1 (shunt) transistor makes the amp sound worse. I've come to the same conclusion when I've used SA970/SC2240 as input stage or VAS in this and other amps.
the 970/2240 is lower noise but I doubt that is what you are hearing.
The next difference could be different gain, but both are available in similar gains.
The biggest difference I can spot is Cob. The 2362 is much lower Cob than the 2240.

Anybody want to offer an opinion on why these sound different?
 
The CM probably needs a little more voltage to operate properly.

The problem is very likely not the output voltage of the current mirror per se but the current source which feeds it. With the 2SK170-based version you show the CCS is half-way saturated during most of the negative voltage swing. Because of that its output current is dynamically reduced, which again dynamically reduces the collector current of the emitter follower. This is seen as prelonged recovery from slewing and likely causes additional distortion which you might hear. A BJT current source would work *much* better.

I don't want to talk you into another revision--if you're happy with it don't touch it. However I feel that it's important to not attribute issues to the wrong source...

Samuel
 
The problem is very likely not the output voltage of the current mirror per se but the current source which feeds it. With the 2SK170-based version you show the CCS is half-way saturated during most of the negative voltage swing. Because of that its output current is dynamically reduced, which again dynamically reduces the collector current of the emitter follower. This is seen as prelonged recovery from slewing and likely causes additional distortion which you might hear. A BJT current source would work *much* better.

I don't want to talk you into another revision--if you're happy with it don't touch it. However I feel that it's important to not attribute issues to the wrong source...

Samuel
In these small amps it's quite impossible to fit a BJT CCS. I used JFETs to make it pocketable. Your input is welcome, and if I make a speaker amp based on this circuit I'll bear this in mind. I'm not so clever with electronics, and I don't understand the saturation issue. Could you explain it so a noob like me can understand it? In reality there's no resistor from source to ground on the J7 JFET. I picked samples with appropriate IDSS.
 
In one of my versions I used 2N5486 as J7 (CCS to the floating CM), and the distortion was bad at higher levels. I wonder if this is effect of saturation. Quite unacceptable, so I changed it to a bipolar CCS and a a small resistor on the T1 emitter with the result of balanced CM collector voltages as per Samuels suggestions. This amp measures better than any other. I guiess you were right Samuel. I haven't listened to it yet.
 

Attachments

  • JFET.jpg
    JFET.jpg
    138.4 KB · Views: 798
I don't understand the saturation issue.

Every CCS needs some voltage to work with; once the collector/drain gets close enough to the emitter/source the according transistor approaches saturation, i.e. it stops working as a transistor so to speak. In a CCS this results in reduced output current--in this saturation region it doesn't behave like a CCS but more like a resistor. For your 2SK170 CCS this will happen for voltages below 3-4 V; with 5 V supply rails there's not much room left.

More on this (though mostly for BJTs) here: www.designinganalogchips.com/_count/designinganalogchips.pdf

See page 75ff.

Samuel
 
I felt challenged by the design problem of implementing the AD797 topology for +/-5 V rails, relatively low quiescent current and reasonable complexity. So I sketched an amplifier which is what I'd start with: JFET-AD797_r1.pdf

As shown the amplifier provides an output voltage of almost 8 Vpp into 100 Ohm with very low distortion. This is achieved by careful design of the biasing elements and the use of boostrapped resistor loads instead of CCSs in the output stage. Pulse response is clean without significant overshoot.

Note that I've not tried this in real world, although I believe it should work well as shown. Possibly C7 might need to be increased somewhat if stability is an issue. Also the quiescent conditions will likely need some adjustment (by altering R4, R7, R8 and R12) to achieve the nominal values as shown in the schematic. R15/R16 should be selected for desired output stage quiescent current. R3 trims voltage offset.

Samuel
 
2 transistor feedback ccs works down to <1 V on output

matched bjt current mirror output is still within 1% at <0.5 V - then you have 5-10 V on the other leg to make a ccs

at least at mA currents where the forward bias of the output bc junction isn't leaking too much


I completely agree that RC bootstrapping can be a good solution but the C is physically large compared to the 2 bjt options above
 
Last edited:
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.