Using the HYPNOTIZE as a general shunt reg PCB

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
queez

Salas - why did you guys use LEDs for Vref duty on these shunt PSs?

Reason I'm asking: I am also inclined to use LED for this, as I do believe they're quieter than most Vrefs, and as quiet as the most expensive ones (which as far as I know go as low as a few uV). LEDs also I believe have noise in the range of 6-8uV.

I do not know what their wideband performance is in this respect (I - totally - assume those 6-8uV to be in the tens of Hz). I could never find any good literature or specs about this, as nobody seems to be really interested in studying LEDs as voltage references, and even less in terms of audio specifics.

I'd be very interested in what you know about this.
Thank you,
Radu.

(P.S. I am getting close to prototyping two boards, very similar to each other, for your shunt PS with current/remote sense with high versatility and availability for customization. do you think there might be interest in putting this into a group buy/order or something along these lines?)
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Because they are really low noise, low impedance, and stiff to their CCS. One generic random red fed by a high -Vp jfet, beat an LM329 in a test I asked syn08 to run on his HP analyzer in JC's Blowtorch thread once. Was something like 35nVsqHz density over audio as a total system, with lowest hum pick up due to close impedance to its current source. Noise does not correlate linearly with the more you use. But multiplying under square root. So there is a final population number to consider against other solutions given the Vout level and Vref you need.

About your other thoughts, PM me.
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Some they already used the ''baby shunt'' I proposed to them some time ago, after the 3 legged series pre reg. It was only a series-parallel Leds matrix fed by an LM317 set up as CCS. Very small and shinny.

If you take care that the pre reg shunt has its CCS set for enough current so to feed the next with enough remaining not to shut off its own shunt element, then if you set the next one's Vout lower, they will work. They had this thing in DAC End recently where they feed multiple TL431 TO-92 local shunts fed from 3 V1.0 Simplistic branches. In the 3rd one they did not test the current draw, were chocking the main CCS and could not set it right for Vout. After they gave it ample current all worked.
 
Thanks Salas. Even though we can use the shunt regulators for the Lightspeed Attenuator, is there any advantages in doing so? In this case, the load seen by the regulator is nearly constant, once we stop adjusting the volume control. We are not worried about drift in output. What we want is very little dynamic fluctuation in the regulated output. Does the shunt regulator offer any advantage over the series regulator here?
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
You must ask in the LSPD thread opinion from a few that used the ''baby''. Maybe they could discern a different tone or not. Strictly technically such a client circuit isn't demanding indeed. Maybe the Zo differences of the regs and the CCS isolation or not could be detectable? Don't know, haven't made it my self because I lack the application for a low Z volume controller yet.
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Strict Vrefs and good ripple kill can be found in series too. As I wrote, there are differences bcs of CCS isolation, Zo and its curve shape for this reg. Can go 5V straight with a couple of leds and a small resistor, try it some time.
 
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Measurements +-24V

1st of all I want to know if the measurements mus be done with the load resistor 500R 5 W (I used 33R//33R 1W per side instead the 68R//68R 1W per side following the kind advice of Salas to get a current of 130mA, when after the reg. going on well I will change for 22R//22R 1W to get the 200mA) if yes these are mine measurements to get +-24V

Voltage across Rs = 60mV
Vout = 5.72V
V across test resistor (220R) = 1.27V

Base voltage = 4.45V (5.72V-1.27V)

V out target 24V - Base voltage 4.45V = 19.57V

60mV / 10R = 6mA

19.57V / 6mA = 3K262 so 3K3 the standard value

So with this resistor in both rails I will get +-24V 130mA, right?

How to know Jfets 0-3mV or 5mV?
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Yes 3k3 will take you to 24V. If your measurements are dead accurate, 24.25V.:)

A load resistor drawing 50mA will not make much difference.

You mention Rs 60mV you mean the drop across the 10 Ohm source resistor of the 2SK170 in Vref.

What is the drop across 33R//33R?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.