I made it look like it's corrected ![Smile :) :)]()
- It's not so simple and I wouldn't say it's actually "corrected". Part of it is due to a wider throat angle - the sandhorn is simulated for a driver with 30° exit section (HF108). The other examples were for 0°.
This is the #80 shown earlier, for 0° and 30° throat angles. It's different but not necessarily better. In the end, all above 15 kHz depends on a particular driver very strongly so this is all academic anyway.
- It's not so simple and I wouldn't say it's actually "corrected". Part of it is due to a wider throat angle - the sandhorn is simulated for a driver with 30° exit section (HF108). The other examples were for 0°.
This is the #80 shown earlier, for 0° and 30° throat angles. It's different but not necessarily better. In the end, all above 15 kHz depends on a particular driver very strongly so this is all academic anyway.
Attachments
Why?How about some waveguides with the lm peak below 1000 Hz?
Finallly, I have an automatic optimization framework ready (Ath+ABEC+AutoIt) - with an axisymmetric device I'm able to get to 20 seconds per iteration.
Sample of 100 results: ATH - Advanced Transition Horns - Gallery
(any of them available on request)
Good job!
With the python script I made last year it was around 90 seconds with an i3 cpu, and the computer couldn't be touched while running
Fine-tuning of axisymmetric free standing 18" OSSE / 1" throat, 0 deg throat angle.
ATH - Advanced Transition Horns - Gallery
Nr. 9 - 433 x 119 mm
Nr. 28 - 476 x 124 mm
Boring already, isn't it![sly :sly: :sly:](https://files.diyaudio.com/forums/images/smilies/sly.gif)
ATH - Advanced Transition Horns - Gallery
Nr. 9 - 433 x 119 mm
Nr. 28 - 476 x 124 mm
Boring already, isn't it
![sly :sly: :sly:](https://files.diyaudio.com/forums/images/smilies/sly.gif)
Attachments
Last edited:
Why?
For the sake of completeness / to compare various profiles?
If your waveguide is the one I sent Jacek sometime in March (⌀600 mm), this should be the result. Based on the previous experience this should match the reality quite well. I would be surprised if it didn't.... Do I do this from the same distance as before, which was about 1 meter from throat.
Attachments
Last edited:
BTW, this is the effect of a measurement distance - the same device observed/"measured" at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 meters from the throat.
- You don't have to worry too much about the mic distance, at least not in this case.
- You don't have to worry too much about the mic distance, at least not in this case.
Attachments
Last edited:
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Acoustic Horn Design – The Easy Way (Ath4)