Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

On the Vertical input, will lowering the value of R1 to 47k cause any issues? I'd like to figure out the open input buzz. It's there when I turn my pre-amp off.

No problem, you can go even lower, as far as your preamp can handle the lower input impedance. You will also need to lower R3 to allow the DC handling the offset. Input impedance practically equals Zin = 1 / (1 / R1 + 1 / R3)

By the way, my prototype has got no hum when the preamp is off. There is just some hum when the input is completely open.
 
Last edited:
No problem, you can go even lower, as far as your preamp can handle the lower input impedance. You will also need to lower R3 to allow the DC handling the offset. Input impedance practically equals Zin = 1 / (1 / R1 + 1 / R3)

By the way, my prototype has got no hum when the preamp is off. There is just some hum when the input is completely open.

My preamp must leave the output floating when it shut's down. I need to get back at the Pitchfork Preamp soon.
 
Soldered the 2-nd channel of the VERTICAL front-end. Just exchanged with the 1-st one - works perfectly right away. Singing on a test bench with the main speakers now.

Jeff, I did some testing with the input disconnected - there is a little bit of noise, but very minor one. I recognize the difference only when my ear is close enough to the speaker. Then, when I connect the pre-amp (being off), it becomes silent, with barely recognizable hiss, and then after powering the pre-amp on, it's not even silence - it's nothing :p

Pre-amp is an Onkyo digital processor in my case.
I'm interested in the nature of the open-input noise in your case - is it some EMF, or just coming from the rails somehow?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0262.JPG
    DSC_0262.JPG
    418 KB · Views: 649
It's good even for BJTs and FETs as well?

Probably yes. "The Hitachi HMA-7500 Mk2 (MOSFET outputs) had the ‘super linear’ feature, and also a ‘distortion servo’ which appears to be some kind of error-correction. It is claimed that the latter reduces output-stage distortion by a factor of three. The HMA-9500 Mk2 (1980) used a ‘super linear’ nonswitching circuit in a different form." - Douglas Self Audio Power Amplifier Design - p.94.
 

Attachments

  • Hitachi_HM-7500.jpg
    Hitachi_HM-7500.jpg
    117.6 KB · Views: 555

Attachments

  • ns-ops.png
    ns-ops.png
    21.4 KB · Views: 527
Last edited:

Attachments

  • ns-ops-2.PNG
    ns-ops-2.PNG
    16 KB · Views: 515
  • ns-ops-2-s.PNG
    ns-ops-2-s.PNG
    14.9 KB · Views: 487
Oh, I see now, it's still a switching OPS just there is a smoother transition at crossover, right..?
I managed it only with 5 1n4148 with EF3 at the pre-drivers and with 47k resistor.
But I just saw dadod's version where it's used in the middle at the drivers:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/253039-unique-cfa-120-230w-amp-5.html#post4607970
As he described if it's not optimized it can even increase distortion..?!

That's why in my NS-OPS I use more precise thermo-compensated voltage reference (the right Vbe spreader), that is fine-tuned in particular environment for the minimum distortion.
 

Attachments

  • Technics NS.jpg
    Technics NS.jpg
    249.9 KB · Views: 598
Standard crappy schematic for japanese amplifiers (pioneer, jvc, technics, yamaha, sony and etc.) from 80s-90s.

Well, it works, it's just not flexible enough for fine-tuning.
Clamp voltage is set by MA27A2 double-diodes, which are impossible to get these days. I use the spreader - same as the one in SU-V8 - in this case I can set the clamp limits the way I want.
 
Hi Valery,

How do you find the relative THD when compared to a standard switching output stage? I have simulated non switching output stages (2EF MOSFET) with connections to the drivers and direct to the MOSFET gate resistors. The results have been disappointing. While the switching noise has disappeared the overall THD increased by an order of magnitude.

Either I have been making some sort of mistake or there is a subtlety I have missed. Does this have to be implemented on a 3EF?

Paul
 
Hi Valery,

How do you find the relative THD when compared to a standard switching output stage? I have simulated non switching output stages (2EF MOSFET) with connections to the drivers and direct to the MOSFET gate resistors. The results have been disappointing. While the switching noise has disappeared the overall THD increased by an order of magnitude.

Either I have been making some sort of mistake or there is a subtlety I have missed. Does this have to be implemented on a 3EF?

Paul

Hi Paul,

The bias clamp mechanism, I use in my NS-OPS, is arranged between the pre-driver and driver stages of 3EF follower. It reduces the overall distortion level significantly - magnitude of an order. See a rather detailed description and live measurements on my web site (the link below in my signature - both NS-OPS and VERTICAL projects). Here are just the key spectrums in combination with my Vertical front-end (attached).

Let me know if you will have questions ;)

Cheers,
Valery
 

Attachments

  • fe47c3_0b2438661d4640c7b73e8e0bba309af2.jpg
    fe47c3_0b2438661d4640c7b73e8e0bba309af2.jpg
    206.8 KB · Views: 451
  • fe47c3_6993edd47f3743fc998783cfa5960aeb.jpg
    fe47c3_6993edd47f3743fc998783cfa5960aeb.jpg
    194.7 KB · Views: 411
  • fe47c3_c7d7efa0c0e54495bc135d781b973db2.jpg
    fe47c3_c7d7efa0c0e54495bc135d781b973db2.jpg
    212.2 KB · Views: 394
  • fe47c3_8699559853f645bb85e35e2cdd88d484.jpg
    fe47c3_8699559853f645bb85e35e2cdd88d484.jpg
    226.5 KB · Views: 382